From: Pavol S. <st...@ra...> - 2003-02-05 23:07:42
|
hi, im just studing your sources... I was looking for something to improve but i found nothing :-) Simply you done great work... really great... but i still want to help you, so i will continue looking in sources :) i have some questions: are you doing all sources alone??? im checking this mailing list since alpha1 i think, but i didnt found there any other code contributor... How many people is in mailing list??? And how many people is using your provider??? |
From: Pavol S. <pa...@st...> - 2003-02-06 11:01:28
|
hi, this is not bug report, its just question... why you have there in FbConnectonPoll.CleanUp CG.Collect??? every where i was looking for this is said, that GC know best when to collect and so... (exact criteria are guarded by microsoft :) i think, that you have to force garbage collection only in case, that you have to dispose expensive resources and i think, that it is better to call dispose and make object not reincarnable... just question for discussion not bug... p. |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2003-02-06 11:35:07
|
Hello: > this is not bug report, its just question... > > why you have there in FbConnectonPoll.CleanUp CG.Collect??? every where > i was looking for this is said, that GC know best when to collect and > so... (exact criteria are guarded by microsoft :) > i think, that you have to force garbage collection only in case, that > you have to dispose expensive resources and i think, that it is better > to call dispose and make object not reincarnable.... Yes i know that this is not really needed, it's only for being sure that all is going well with garbage collection :) Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2003-02-06 12:49:03
|
Hello: > i think, that you have to force garbage collection only in case, that > you have to dispose expensive resources and i think, that it is better > to call dispose and make object not reincarnable... I have made some tests to the firebird .net provider without GC.Collect() Call using the as3ap bechmark with the 40 mb data ( that gives then 10 users simulation in multiuser mode ) and all seems to work well and memory used is aproximately the same than without it, i have removed this call and commit the changes to the CVS Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2003-02-05 23:28:41
|
Hello: > im just studing your sources... I was looking for something to improve but i > found nothing :-) > Simply you done great work... really great... but i still want to help you, > so i will continue looking in sources :) Thanks very much :) > i have some questions: > > are you doing all sources alone??? im checking this mailing list since > alpha1 i think, but i didnt found there any other code contributor... At this moment yes i'm alone :), but there are a guy ( Tom Antony ) that contribute the source code of isc_database_info method of the gds, and i need to give great thanks to people that report the errors that they found. There are some things that i can make like see if i can make the implementation FbPermission and FbPermissionAttribute, but there really little information on how this classes need to work and i'm not sure that they are really needed at all, and try to add support to array fields but for this i need to see Firebird sources and this will get lots of time to me since i have a limited knowledge of C/C++. > How many people is in mailing list??? I don't know but i can try to ask it to one of the list admins to see if he can say the number to us. > And how many people is using your provider??? For this i only can tell the number of downloads that are reflected in Sourceforge project page: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=9028 Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From:
<car...@te...> - 2003-02-06 08:38:43
|
Hello: > How many people is in mailing list??? There are 43 people who have subscribed to the list. Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |