You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(36) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(38) |
Feb
(108) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(130) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(121) |
Sep
(96) |
Oct
(149) |
Nov
(161) |
Dec
(113) |
2004 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(163) |
Mar
(248) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(157) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(236) |
Aug
(284) |
Sep
(293) |
Oct
(277) |
Nov
(257) |
Dec
(356) |
2005 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(190) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(124) |
Jun
(160) |
Jul
(190) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(152) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(187) |
Dec
(159) |
2006 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(151) |
Mar
(212) |
Apr
(262) |
May
(226) |
Jun
(196) |
Jul
(223) |
Aug
(165) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(348) |
Nov
(225) |
Dec
(141) |
2007 |
Jan
(261) |
Feb
(161) |
Mar
(222) |
Apr
(193) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(157) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(159) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(172) |
Dec
(96) |
2008 |
Jan
(104) |
Feb
(138) |
Mar
(131) |
Apr
(131) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(107) |
Jul
(89) |
Aug
(89) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(158) |
Nov
(119) |
Dec
(86) |
2009 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(84) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(60) |
Aug
(62) |
Sep
(50) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(70) |
2010 |
Jan
(135) |
Feb
(113) |
Mar
(74) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(71) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(110) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(34) |
2011 |
Jan
(46) |
Feb
(47) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(51) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(22) |
2012 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(35) |
2013 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(45) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(25) |
2014 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(40) |
2015 |
Jan
(52) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(41) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(43) |
2016 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(39) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(33) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(20) |
2017 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(40) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(19) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(5) |
2018 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
2020 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(16) |
2021 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 13:31:22
|
Hello: > Is it working? Because when I start transaction with > IsolationLevel.RepeatableRead, it doesn't put any lock on the records > (it should put a lock on updating, allows inserting). If I'm using > IsolationLevel.Serializable, it works fine (locks from updating and > inserting). RepeteableRead isolation level in the .NET provider is configured using: isc_tpb_write isc_tpb_wait isc_tpb_concurrency -- Un saludo Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-España "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 13:29:49
|
Hello: > Again, documentaion support for newbies is soooooooo > poor! :) RC2 and RC3 binares was built using .NET Framework 1.1, if you are using VS 2002 you need to build the provider sources using .NET Framework 1.0, for this you need to download NAnt ( nant.sourceforge.net ) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-España "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 13:22:25
|
Hello: > its better to do for each function own class, becouse if you want to > implement FbPermissions you will need this... Thanks -- Un saludo Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-España "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Paul D. <pau...@ya...> - 2003-05-09 13:14:28
|
Hello all! I'm kind a newbie to Dot Net. I've done some programming with Visual Basic 6 connecting to Firebird trough serveral OLEBD Prividers. Now I've decided to switch to Dot Net, trough Visual Basic.Net from VS.NET 2002, and I've got also the Firebird Net Provider. First: I've searched the mailing list, trying to figure out if Firebird will be showed in the Server Explorer in Visual Studio, but I couldn't find a reference to that. I still don't know. Wouldn't it be nice if this would be shown somewhere in the documentation? Second: I've just reinstalled my computer from scratch. Windows 2000 Professional SP3, Firebird 1.02 Client, Visual Studio.NET 2002, FirebirdNetProvider-1.0-RC3. When I'm trying to reference the provider (Right-click on the Data Tab -> Customize Toolbox... -> .NET Framwork Components Tab -> Browse to FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.dll) I got an error message saying "The assembly 'C:\Program Files\FirebirdNetProvider\FirebirdSql.Data.Firebird.dll' could not be loaded. Check that any dependencies the file requires are installed." What is missing, what should I do? Or I am doing the wrong way? Again, documentaion support for newbies is soooooooo poor! :) Best regards, Paul __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com |
From: Pavol S. <pa...@st...> - 2003-05-09 13:09:43
|
Hi, its better to do for each function own class, becouse if you want to implement FbPermissions you will need this... p. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 13:00:54
|
Hello: > Are you going to provide 2 different assemblies or only 1? > I think having 2 assemblies would provide the option of installing only the > needed set. My first idea is to release only one assembly but depending on resulting Services class hierarchy can be better to provide two assemblys. > Thanks for this wonderful piece of software. It works very well, I'm going > to use it in a large project. Thanks to you :) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Alessandro P. <pet...@in...> - 2003-05-09 12:24:30
|
"Carlos Guzman Alvarez" <car...@te...> wrote in message news:3EB...@te...... > Hello: > > > I'm implementing in the C# GDS implementation methods for handle > Services API of Firebird, now i want to know people thoughts on some > questions: > > 1. It's interesting or not to make a set or clasess wrapping the > Services API ?? > > 2. If asnwer to the first question is Yes, how we can implement it: > 2.1 As a single public class called FbServices and let people to wrap it. > > 2.2 Make a set of classes wrapping the Services funcionaluty, for > example FbBackup, FbRestore, FbXXXXX, and here we need to think if we > want to wrap all the funcionaly or only some things and how to expose > the funcionality ( like Services API constants ). > > 2.3 Other ?? > > > My answers are: > > 1. Yes. Agree. > 2. I think method 2.2 it's better. Agree. Are you going to provide 2 different assemblies or only 1? I think having 2 assemblies would provide the option of installing only the needed set. Thanks for this wonderful piece of software. It works very well, I'm going to use it in a large project. Regards, Alessandro Petrelli. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 12:14:10
|
Hello: > I think i have it fixed in my local tree, i will commit it into CVS when > i have made the Nunit tests. Commited, if you can please test it. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Danieius J. <ju...@ka...> - 2003-05-09 10:29:25
|
Is it working? Because when I start transaction with IsolationLevel.RepeatableRead, it doesn't put any lock on the records (it should put a lock on updating, allows inserting). If I'm using IsolationLevel.Serializable, it works fine (locks from updating and inserting). Maybe Firebird doesn't support such a lock? -- Danieius Jurna ju...@ka... |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 10:20:23
|
Hello: > I have an array column of 12000 integers because is the maximum number of > elements. > The problem is that not always my arrays contain the 12000 values. Can I > insert a new > row with less values without generating an exception? What about partial > updates? I think i have it fixed in my local tree, i will commit it into CVS when i have made the Nunit tests. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Jesus A. <ja...@er...> - 2003-05-09 10:11:34
|
Hi all, I am playing with the capabilities of the array data type with the development version 1.1. I need it because I would like to retrieve data segments using the indexes instead of using blobs and relying on the offset. I have an array column of 12000 integers because is the maximum number of elements. The problem is that not always my arrays contain the 12000 values. Can I insert a new row with less values without generating an exception? What about partial updates? Anybody else is playing with arrays? Regards, Jesus |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-09 09:14:06
|
HEllo: > I'm using sql statment, to check for concurrency as suggested in .NET > documentation: > "update table set ID=?, Item=? where (ID=?) and (Item=?)" > And 2 last parameters with System.Data.DataRowVersion.Original option. > Everything works fine. But it would be nice if command builder would > build a similal update command. Now it builds a plain update command > without concurrency implementation. > Or maybe there is some other way to implement concurrency? I will try to see that. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Danieius J. <ju...@ka...> - 2003-05-09 08:00:52
|
I'm using sql statment, to check for concurrency as suggested in .NET documentation: "update table set ID=?, Item=? where (ID=?) and (Item=?)" And 2 last parameters with System.Data.DataRowVersion.Original option. Everything works fine. But it would be nice if command builder would build a similal update command. Now it builds a plain update command without concurrency implementation. Or maybe there is some other way to implement concurrency? -- Danieius Jurna ju...@ka... |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-08 17:47:58
|
Hello: I'm implementing in the C# GDS implementation methods for handle Services API of Firebird, now i want to know people thoughts on some questions: 1. It's interesting or not to make a set or clasess wrapping the Services API ?? 2. If asnwer to the first question is Yes, how we can implement it: 2.1 As a single public class called FbServices and let people to wrap it. 2.2 Make a set of classes wrapping the Services funcionaluty, for example FbBackup, FbRestore, FbXXXXX, and here we need to think if we want to wrap all the funcionaly or only some things and how to expose the funcionality ( like Services API constants ). 2.3 Other ?? My answers are: 1. Yes. 2. I think method 2.2 it's better. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Christopher W. <chr...@ad...> - 2003-05-08 14:37:10
|
Hi Carlos, I had problems logging into CVS earlier, but I was able to connect a few minutes ago. I recompiled the dll for framework 1.0 and was able to verify that the problem I was having is now fixed. Thanks a lot! Chris Whelan On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 05:55, Carlos Guzman Alvarez wrote: > Hello: > > > How should I handle this problem as it seems that I cannot close or free > > this connection because it is in limbo? > > I have commited a fix for this into the CVS if you can please test it. > |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-08 09:45:44
|
Hello: > How should I handle this problem as it seems that I cannot close or free > this connection because it is in limbo? I have commited a fix for this into the CVS if you can please test it. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Christopher W. <chr...@ad...> - 2003-05-07 21:10:39
|
Hi- I am having the following problem with the FbConnection class: For testing purposes, I intentionally call fbConn.Open() with a connection string that contains an invalid user or password. It is also set not to pool. The invalid user/password causes an exception to be thrown that I catch. In the catch block I call fbConn.Close(). I then change the user/password and try again. This time when fbConn.Open() is called on the same instance, a different exception is thrown that says the connection is already open. The ConnectionState on the connection appears to be permanently stuck on "Connecting". I looked at the source code for FbConnection.Close() and it appears that it ignores any ConnectionState other than "Open". If I change the source in FbConnection.Close() initial if() statement to include ConnectionState.Connecting, I get an invalid database handle exception. How should I handle this problem as it seems that I cannot close or free this connection because it is in limbo? Thanks. Chris Whelan |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-06 22:25:09
|
Hello: > I am getting the same System.TypeLoad exception with RC3 as someone else did previously with RC2. I compiled the .Net Provider from source forcing NAnt to compile using the 1.1 version of the framework. I am using visual studio 2002, but I have not encountered this problem with any other programs that are using PInvoke under the covers. > > Any assistance with this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. If you are using VS 2002 you need to build the provider sources using .NET Framework 1.0 ( as i know VS 2002 works only with .NET Framework 1.0 ) -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Chris W. <chr...@ad...> - 2003-05-06 21:00:07
|
Hi- I am getting the same System.TypeLoad exception with RC3 as someone else = did previously with RC2. I compiled the .Net Provider from source = forcing NAnt to compile using the 1.1 version of the framework. I am = using visual studio 2002, but I have not encountered this problem with = any other programs that are using PInvoke under the covers. Any assistance with this problem would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -Chris Whelan |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-06 08:39:52
|
Hello: > Does anyone see what I am doing wrong here? I'm trying to reproduce it ( without luck at this moment ), can you send the message and stack trace of the exception ??, please. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-05 15:05:58
|
Hello: Firebird .NET Data Provider Release Candidate 3 available for download. You can view the changelog at: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=157258 You can download binarys at: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/firebird/FirebirdNetProvider-1.0-RC3.exe?download You can download sources at: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/firebird/FirebirdNetProvider-1.0-RC3-Src.zip?download You can download documentation at: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/firebird/FirebirdNetProvider-1.0-RC3-Doc.zip?download CVS Tag: NP1_0_RC3 -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-03 13:10:07
|
Hello: > I have made no test with the embedded server and the .NET Provider, i > will try to do that next week. I'm reading the README file of the embedded server and i think the NET Provider will not work with it, because NET provider has his own implementation of the GDS ( Firebird API ). -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-03 12:22:12
|
Hello: > Hello, I get the same exception when trying to connect to the database. Can > the .Net Data Provider connect to the embedded server? I have made no test with the embedded server and the .NET Provider, i will try to do that next week. -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: Carlos G. A. <car...@te...> - 2003-05-03 12:19:53
|
Hello: I'm making test without problems, can you tell me if this is correct test case, please: public static void Main(string[] args) { string connectionString = @"Database=D:\TESTDB.GDB;" + "User=SYSDBA;" + "Password=masterkey;"; FbConnection connection = new FbConnection(connectionString); connection.Open(); FbTransaction transaction = connection.BeginTransaction(); string commandText = "select * from TEST_TABLE_01 where int_field = @ID"; FbCommand command = new FbCommand(commandText, connection,transaction); command.Parameters.Add("@ID", FbType.Integer); getNodeData(command, 1); getNodeData(command, 2); getNodeData(command, 3); connection.Close(); } public static void getNodeData(FbCommand command, int id) { command.Parameters["@ID"].Value = id; try { FbDataReader reader = command.ExecuteReader(System.Data.CommandBehavior.SingleRow); try { if (!reader.Read()) { throw new Exception("Node not found")"); } } finally { reader.Close(); } } catch { throw; } } -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |
From: <car...@te...> - 2003-05-03 12:00:58
|
Hello: > Does anyone see what I am doing wrong here? I'm going to try to see it today, wich version of the NET provider are you using ?? RC2 ?? -- Best regards Carlos Guzmán Álvarez Vigo-Spain "No tengo dones especiales.Sólo soy apasionadamente curioso" Albert Einstein, científico. |