From: Max H. <ma...@qu...> - 2010-06-29 09:48:46
|
Am 29.06.2010 um 04:51 schrieb Benjamin Reed: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 6/28/10 10:35 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: >> Dear fink-core and friends, >> >> For various reasons, I am contemplating moving the crypto tree so >> that it becomes a subdirectory of main, just like base, devel, etc. >> In other words, the contents of crypto/finkinfo would be moved to >> main/finkinfo/crypto . I think that move itself could be made >> without causing any trouble -- does anybody see any difficulties with >> it? > > Nope, sounds good to me. Same here. Though, I have to wonder on whether this also implies any policy changes? Would we still over -ssl and non-ssl variants of things? > >> We could then *eliminate* stable/crypto and unstable/crypto from the >> Trees line in fink.conf, and make some corresponding changes to >> apt's configuration. This is trickier, but if stable/crypto and >> unstable/crypto just became empty directories I think things would >> continue to work without such a change. Right? > > Yeah, as long as there's an empty directory, it should be fine. I guess a README should be put in there, which explains were everything went. This has the second beneficial effect of making sure that cvs' prune option does not remove the then-empty directory when doing a "cvs up -P", which could potentially cause trouble otherwise. Bye, Max |