Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux
Ubuntu
Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(22) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(86) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(58) |
Dec
(40) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
(100) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(176) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(199) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(57) |
Sep
(61) |
Oct
(148) |
Nov
(125) |
Dec
(106) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(66) |
May
(101) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(82) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(76) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(123) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(135) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(83) |
Apr
(97) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(65) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(220) |
Apr
(262) |
May
(107) |
Jun
(145) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(111) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(45) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(79) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(85) |
Nov
(80) |
Dec
(70) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(167) |
Feb
(114) |
Mar
(181) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(211) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(52) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(72) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(89) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(97) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(90) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(152) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(60) |
Feb
(52) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(41) |
Jun
(66) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(48) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(39) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
(1) |
2
(1) |
3
(1) |
4
(3) |
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
(1) |
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
(1) |
14
(4) |
15
|
16
(1) |
17
(5) |
18
(2) |
|
19
(1) |
20
(8) |
21
(7) |
22
(1) |
23
(2) |
24
(1) |
25
(17) |
|
26
(3) |
27
(5) |
28
(16) |
29
(1) |
30
(3) |
31
(1) |
|
|
From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@jo...> - 2007-08-14 14:07:20
|
Francois.ernoult wrote: > Hi guys, > >>> A minor observation. I've had communication from someone who's tested >>> svn515 with a MOTU 828MkII. They noticed the following: >>> >>> > Latency is reported to Jack's clients as if the number of period per >>> > buffer was 1. >>> >>> This issue would affect all MOTUs AFAIK >> There are some fixes to the freebob jack backend that haven't been >> propagated to the firewire jack backend yet. This is one of them. >> > > This observation also applies to FreeBoB svn r389 (around last working > FreeBoB rev for MOTU). > I will track changes to FreeBoB since r389 and try to make it working for > FFADO. I'll do a patch when I'll find a fix. Note that I'm not talking about freebob or ffado itself, but about their respective backends in the jack source tree. Greets, Pieter |
|
From: Francois.ernoult <francois.ernoult@pa...> - 2007-08-14 13:57:36
|
Hi guys, > > A minor observation. I've had communication from someone who's tested > > svn515 with a MOTU 828MkII. They noticed the following: > > > > > Latency is reported to Jack's clients as if the number of period per > > > buffer was 1. > > > > This issue would affect all MOTUs AFAIK > > There are some fixes to the freebob jack backend that haven't been > propagated to the firewire jack backend yet. This is one of them. > This observation also applies to FreeBoB svn r389 (around last working FreeBoB rev for MOTU). I will track changes to FreeBoB since r389 and try to make it working for FFADO. I'll do a patch when I'll find a fix. Regards, Francois |
|
From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@jo...> - 2007-08-14 13:38:59
|
Jonathan Woithe wrote: > Hi guys > > A minor observation. I've had communication from someone who's tested > svn515 with a MOTU 828MkII. They noticed the following: > > > Latency is reported to Jack's clients as if the number of period per > > buffer was 1. > > This issue would affect all MOTUs AFAIK - it's not restricted just to the > 828MkII although I have not personally verified it with the Traveler. > However, I'm wondering whether it's something about the MOTU driver which is > doing this or if it's a known FFADO issue which is still being worked on. > > I note that in the JACK svn all calls to jack_port_set_latency() in the > ffado driver are commented out. Now I have no idea how the whole latency > reporting thing works in JACK but it seems to me that this might be in some > way related. I also see that the freebob driver does call > jack_port_set_latency(). My tentative conclusion is that it's a FFADO issue > and something which is still being worked on, but I'd like confirmation of > this theory. If it is instead a MOTU problem I'll obviously spend some time > trying to work it out. There are some fixes to the freebob jack backend that haven't been propagated to the firewire jack backend yet. This is one of them. Once we go alpha we'll have to propagate/merge these fixes. Greets, Pieter |
|
From: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@ph...> - 2007-08-13 01:00:36
|
Hi guys A minor observation. I've had communication from someone who's tested svn515 with a MOTU 828MkII. They noticed the following: > Latency is reported to Jack's clients as if the number of period per > buffer was 1. This issue would affect all MOTUs AFAIK - it's not restricted just to the 828MkII although I have not personally verified it with the Traveler. However, I'm wondering whether it's something about the MOTU driver which is doing this or if it's a known FFADO issue which is still being worked on. I note that in the JACK svn all calls to jack_port_set_latency() in the ffado driver are commented out. Now I have no idea how the whole latency reporting thing works in JACK but it seems to me that this might be in some way related. I also see that the freebob driver does call jack_port_set_latency(). My tentative conclusion is that it's a FFADO issue and something which is still being worked on, but I'd like confirmation of this theory. If it is instead a MOTU problem I'll obviously spend some time trying to work it out. Regards jonathan |
|
From: Michael Lindsey <mblindsey@gm...> - 2007-08-08 04:15:30
|
my email to presonus. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Lindsey <mblindsey@...> Date: Aug 7, 2007 4:05 PM Subject: FireStudio - Linux Support To: bzell@..., mtwilliams@..., rnaqvi@..., wdevore@..., kbueche@... I have a Presonus FireStudio, and it is a great device. I would love to be able to use it with Linux, but support doesn't currently exist. Apparently, there is an open source effort underway to create a driver for this device. However, it appears that the developers need cooperation from Presonus to complete this task. You can see a discussion at this link: http://sourceforge.net/search/?group_id=192582&words=presonus&type_of_search=mlists&pmode=0&words=firestudio&Search=Search I encourage you to work with these developers. Users like myself tend to be very loyal to companies that provide Linux support. Regards, Michael Lindsey |
|
From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@jo...> - 2007-08-04 21:03:39
|
Heikki Lindholm wrote: > Pieter Palmers kirjoitti: >> Heikki Lindholm wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> What is the state of affairs of DICE II support? There seems to be >>> sane looking code in the SVN trunk, but no actual devices are listed. >>> Is there something in the works or awaiting hardware or testers? I >>> have a T.C. Konnekt box which I'd like to use in Linux. >> >> I have forwarded your email to TC Applied, the company that makes the >> DICE and that is closely related to TC Electronic. According to them >> the people at TC are definitely interested in making the device >> working in Linux. But they can't provide a timeframe for that. > > Do you mean that TC are going to expend their own developers to > contribute into FFADO? I don't think that they are going to do that. > What about the code that is in SVN already? Does > it do anything useful or is it just a blind copy of something? The code in SVN only provides support for the DICE evaluation modules that vendors build their products on. It is rather useless for devices like the Kontakt that have extensive customizations. > >> The way things are now they are not going to be part of the first >> FFADO release, which I would like to finish sometime soon. > > Using SVN trunk will be fine by me.. As long as we don't have access to the hardware and to some info regarding the customizations done, we're not able to support a device. Therefore SVN trunk won't help you at the moment. Apparently the people making the decisions at TC Electronic are on holidays at the moment, but next week they should be available again. TC Applied has told me that they would contact me on this next week. Greets, Pieter Palmers |
|
From: Heikki Lindholm <holindho@cs...> - 2007-08-04 11:02:30
|
Pieter Palmers kirjoitti: > Heikki Lindholm wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> What is the state of affairs of DICE II support? There seems to be >> sane looking code in the SVN trunk, but no actual devices are listed. >> Is there something in the works or awaiting hardware or testers? I >> have a T.C. Konnekt box which I'd like to use in Linux. > > I have forwarded your email to TC Applied, the company that makes the > DICE and that is closely related to TC Electronic. According to them the > people at TC are definitely interested in making the device working in > Linux. But they can't provide a timeframe for that. Do you mean that TC are going to expend their own developers to contribute into FFADO? What about the code that is in SVN already? Does it do anything useful or is it just a blind copy of something? > The way things are now they are not going to be part of the first FFADO > release, which I would like to finish sometime soon. Using SVN trunk will be fine by me.. -- Heikki Lindholm |
|
From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@jo...> - 2007-08-04 10:54:39
|
Heikki Lindholm wrote: > Hello, > > What is the state of affairs of DICE II support? There seems to be sane > looking code in the SVN trunk, but no actual devices are listed. Is > there something in the works or awaiting hardware or testers? I have a > T.C. Konnekt box which I'd like to use in Linux. I have forwarded your email to TC Applied, the company that makes the DICE and that is closely related to TC Electronic. According to them the people at TC are definitely interested in making the device working in Linux. But they can't provide a timeframe for that. The way things are now they are not going to be part of the first FFADO release, which I would like to finish sometime soon. Greets, Pieter Palmers |
|
From: Heikki Lindholm <holindho@cs...> - 2007-08-03 16:24:17
|
Hello, What is the state of affairs of DICE II support? There seems to be sane looking code in the SVN trunk, but no actual devices are listed. Is there something in the works or awaiting hardware or testers? I have a T.C. Konnekt box which I'd like to use in Linux. Regards, Heikki Lindholm |
|
From: Thomas Drueke <its_music@gm...> - 2007-08-02 19:07:07
|
> i'm vary satisfied with my Edirol FA-101 so far. > 8x8 + midi + 2 digital i/o, phones, direct monitor + 2 mic preamps incl > phantom power > > it works with current freebob implementation in jack 103 > > it records on 96khz all 8 channels. > > http://www.google.com/search?q=edirol%20fa-101 > > it's less then 400eur at thomann: > http://www.thomann.de/gb/search_dir.html?sw=edirol+fa-101 > > > ll. > Hi Luka, does MIDI work for you with the Edirol FA-101 and freebob ? BR Thomas |
|
From: Luka Princic / Nova Viator <nova@vi...> - 2007-08-01 22:12:22
|
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:50:40 +0200 anReinhard@... wrote: > Hi all, > > i'm currently awaiting the first official release of ffado and in the meantime searching about the best FW audio interface for me. Facts should be: > > - headphone out > - >= 6 analog out > - able to record at 96kHz > - supports MIDI (currently no sysex is supported on any devices with freebob/ffado as i understand - will this change? I'm planning to switch with sysex data some controls of an effects box in realtime - along with sending/receiving audio....) > i'm vary satisfied with my Edirol FA-101 so far. 8x8 + midi + 2 digital i/o, phones, direct monitor + 2 mic preamps incl phantom power it works with current freebob implementation in jack 103 it records on 96khz all 8 channels. http://www.google.com/search?q=edirol%20fa-101 it's less then 400eur at thomann: http://www.thomann.de/gb/search_dir.html?sw=edirol+fa-101 ll. -- Ah, the Tsar's bazaar's bizarre beaux-arts! + http://viator.si |