Re: [fetchyahoo-general] Still active?

[Chris J. <ch...@je...>]

   Drat, I was just learning about mpop too. So why does it work for Pete? 
I'll try it anyway and see what happens.

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Dan Jones wrote:

> I tried that too. No go. Got an error message:
>       POP access is limited to Yahoo! Mail Plus subscribers. Please contact Yahoo! Mail's support team for more information.
> 
>  
> 
> Dan Jones
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Pete Geenhuizen <pe...@ge...> wrote:
>
>       Oops sorry, I should add that I try not to pay for squat, and I
>       On 11/20/2012 02:24 PM, Chris Jenks wrote:
>
>               Yes, I thought this was the whole point of fetchyahoo, since I could have paid for yahoo's POP service many years ago. That's a
>             possibility in this case, but with five accounts in my family that would start to add up.
>
>             On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Dan Jones wrote:
> 
> Oops sorry, I should add that I try not to pay for squat and I remember that Yahoo had that  pay upgrade stuff on their page, which is why I stated using
> fetyahoo as well.
> I was messing around with my IMAP server and I don't recall how I stumbled across the settings/idea and  gave it a shot an viola it worked.
> 
> So give it a shot here's what I have Thunderbird set to to at least read email, don't recall if I've tried sending email from this configuration.
> 
> Server:               imap.mail.yahoo.com         default port: 993
> Security:             SSL/TLS
> Authentication: normal password
> 
> --
> Unencumbered by the thought process.
>  -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers
> 
> 
> 
>