Re: [Fetchmail-users] my solution to recent gmail issues

[Mihai L. <mt...@gm...>]

For pretty much the same setup (fetchmail, procmail, 
and mutt), I found that the Email OAuth 2.0 Proxy 
https://github.com/simonrob/email-oauth2-proxy was very easy 
to blend in.

Best,
Mihai

On Monday, January 22, 2024 at 16:39:54 +0100, Lucio Chiappetti:

> I have recently received a message that I *SHALL* move to 2 Factor
> Authentication in Gsuite, and, as I suspected, this broke my
> arrangement (which exists sicne years and years) and I took my
> counter-measures, and I wish to share.
>
> In a nutshell what I wanted to achieve and what I did is:
>
> (1) I want to have mail stored locally on my machine, and to have
>     incoming mails processed by procmail (this is not just for my fun,
>     I have a couple of cases where procmail post-processes mail from
>     forms to update a local database for service reasons).
>
> (2) The simplest way to feed incoming mails into procmail is to use
>    fetchmail, which I am happily using since 2018, when my institution
>    moved from howgrown sendmail to Gsuite
>
> (3) The simplest way to have fetchmail working (after I activated
>     2FA on Gsuite fetchmail was not authenticateds) is to "bypass" Gmail,
>     i.e. instruct Gsuite to forward all mail to another provider which
>     provides *standard* IMAP.
>
>     This solves 98% of my problems, because
>
>     - Spam is not forwarded from Gmail to the alternate provider
>     - messages forwrded *and deleted* are not actually deleted
>       but staged in Gmail's Bin for 30 days
>
> (4)  The solution is ... "app passwords". Gmail with 2FA allows to
>     define a 16-char password THEY generate to be used with what in
>     the past were called provocatorily "less secure applications"
>
>     So I generated such an "app passwords" and I can use it from my
>     preferred mail client (Alpine). And this solves my problem.
>
> (5)  Actually the same app password can work also with fetchmail,
>     so in theory I would not need the alternate provider of point (3) and
>     could work "as previously", but I left it in.
>
> I had no need to move to OAUTH2, or learn it, or get an
> OAUTH2-capable version of fetchmail (I use the OS-bundled one).
>
> I think I could be happy with the new arrangement.
>
> I hope the above is useful to somebody else.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fetchmail-users mailing list
> Fet...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fetchmail-users