From: jdow <jd...@ds...> - 2019-04-27 21:29:16
|
On 20190427 03:24:33, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Joanne, > > Copying back in the list, and quoting verbosely... > >>> I think it would be worthing checking in Centos's package-upgrade >>> log to see what packages upgraded around 2019-Apr-04 when the >>> symptom appeared. >> >> I started to do that but checked back in logs first. The issue >> happened intermittently well before it went bad. Clamav was updated on >> that date. It is used in the spamassassin processing using spamd. So >> if it was a spamassassin thing spamd would be opening the port or >> procmail would be opening the port. Auditd showed it was fetchmail >> that opened the port. > > I don't think that's true. I think Clamav/Spamassassin can feed back > the status to fetchmail that then sends the bounce. I do have bounces disabled with spamassassin. This is happening on the order of 900 times a day. I poll fetchmail once a minute, 1440 times a day. I do not get 900 mails a day. I get on the order of 200 spams a day and about 50 non-spams a day. So the numbers do not align. I consider bounce emails to be exceptionally evil after being stuck on the "Bounce" end of several joe jobs before people became aware of the problem. {^_^} |