From: Hans C. <fo...@gm...> - 2018-10-01 22:54:40
|
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Matthias Andree wrote: > I am somewhat inclined to take a variant of your (Hans's) patch and make > it emit ISO8601 formatted time stamps, in UTC (to avoid ambiguity of > 2:05 A and 2:05 B in the night when the DST is switched off), and that's > it. The alternative would be a plain timestamp (seconds since UTC Epoch > or something) Would it be unreasonable to include both ISO8601 and time_t? eg. 2018-10-01T22:50:44+00:00 (1538434244) The time_t would simply be easier for an external script to parse. |