From: <kj...@o2...> - 2017-12-03 19:30:50
|
Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> writes: [...] > > Unfortunately, fetchmail 6.3.26 cannot currently work decently in this > situation because it lacks UID + UIDVALIDITY support. There were past > contributions to add UID support but without UIDVALIDITY; so they were > worthless. Such code still needs to be written I'm afraid. > I am interested in writing IMAP UID code, and below my thoughts: - we have to deal with uidvalidity - we have to deal with folders (each imap folder have its own uidvalidity/uid list) - uid.c code has a lot of quirks to manage lot of strange thigs with pop-uids (spaces and @-sings in names and uids - yes?) - imap uids are far simpler (they are integers, even sorted IIRC) - so (despite I hate to duplicate code) it is worth consider having imap uids next to pop3 uids, not modify uid.c? It is my 3¢, what do you think? KJ -- http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/ Ogólny sens [helpa z W98] jest poprawny. Pod warunkiem, że z góry wiadomo co autor miał na myśli. -- Marcin Wieczorek na p.c.o.a. |