From: Ralph C. <ra...@in...> - 2017-11-20 15:46:15
|
Hi Matthias, > > I used fetchmail 6.3.26-6 ... > > About to rewrite To: group-addr: ;, ra...@ex...... > > ...rewritten version is To: group-addr: ;@ruis.pair.com, ra...@ex.... > > Please file a proper report. > <http://www.fetchmail.info/fetchmail-FAQ.html#G3> No, sorry, you haven't made clear what's lacking and I've already spent too much time trying to find out how to report a bug; that shouldn't be buried in the FAQ. It seems very likely from looking at fetchmail-6.3.26.tar.xz's rfc822.c's reply_hack() that this section kicks in erroneously. /* * Not expanding on last non-WS == ';' deals with groupnames, * an obscure misfeature described in sections * 6.1, 6.2.6, and A.1.5 of the RFC822 standard. */ else if ((*from == ',' || HEADER_END(from)) && has_bare_name_part && !has_host_part && last_nws != ';') { ... *from++ = '@'; memcpy(from, host, hostlen); from = p + hostlen + 1; has_host_part = TRUE; } If there's useful data I can provide, let me know as fetchmail is currently corrupting modern, valid, emails that are in the wild; not some exotic test case. -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy |