From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2016-06-08 20:42:14
|
Am 08.06.2016 um 21:59 schrieb Samuel Martin: > Hi Matthias, > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> wrote: >> Am 08.06.2016 um 21:36 schrieb Samuel Martin: >>> This change does: >>> - use repr(...) instead of `...` (see [1]); >>> - fix print call; >>> - fix octal numbers. >>> >>> [1] https://docs.python.org/release/3.0.1/whatsnew/3.0.html#removed-syntax >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Martin <s.m...@gm...> >> >> Hi Samuel, >> >> thanks for the submission. >> >> Out of curiosity and due to the "from __future__ import >> print_function()", what is the minimum Python 2.x version that this code >> will be compatible with? Anything older than 2.7? > According to [1], print_function should be available since python-2.6. > To be honest, I did check with python-2.7, but not with python-2.6 > (long gone on my machine ;-]) Just checked, Python 2.6 is no longer supported, so for legacy_64 that change should be acceptable because it paves the way this code can run for a while longer. I've done away with compatibility with older OpenSSL anyways and need TLSv1.2 capable implementations, so why stop there... |