From: Grant E. <gra...@gm...> - 2014-04-09 17:36:57
|
On 2014-04-09, Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> wrote: > Am 04.04.2014 18:53, schrieb Grant Edwards: > >> In my googling, I didn't find anybody who wanted STARTTLS support, >> just standard pop3s. If one were to submit a patch adding support >> for pop3s, would it be accepted? [I've learned the hard way to ask >> before starting work on new features for open-source projects.] > > Grant, > > For POP3, StartTLS (STLS) is already in place, albeit with an awkward > unintuitive configuration, because fetchmail 6.x lumps SSL protocol > selection together with wrapped vs. STARTTLS mode. Sorry, I started out talking about SMTP and switched to POP3 without explanation. I found people asking about POP3 (which as you point out is already handled) and wrapped SMTP but not STARTTLS. I somehow managed to mangle my posting and started typing pop instead of smtp. > If you were to provide a clean patch for wrapped SSL or STARTTLS for > (E)SMTP, against the Git master branch, I would definitely look at > it. Thanks, I would be interested in working on that. > We would need to discuss how to select modes and protocols, though. I have no opinion or preference, so if you would like to suggest something, that would be great. > I would rather not add to the proliferation of command line/rcfile > options if it can be helped. :) I've always found fetchmail's configuration syntax confusing, and every time I set up fetchmail I do it mostly by trail-and-error. At first I thought it was just me, then when ESR decided he needed to write a GUI config file editor I realized it wasn't just me... > I will not add features to the legacy_63 branch. No problem. -- Grant |