From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2013-03-01 18:05:06
|
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> wrote: > I see these alternatives: > > A1 - the obvious option would be to add a "noretain" keyword that would > tell fetchmail to never retain messages. > > A2 - the less obvious option I have suggested, and that is to require > that servers do not expose their internals to clients, and remove the > kludge code in fetchmail for good (although it is tiny enough to not > care about code size). > > A3 - I might also, instead of A1, default this code to off and add a > "kludge-retain-folder-internal-data" option, which would be somewhat > quieter than in fetchmail 6.3.X. > > Opinions? A2 makes the most sense to me for 7.0. If you weren't already making a number of significant changes I'd have supported A3, but you are so it's probably time to abandon support for things superseded (repeatedly) over a decade ago ;) -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |