From: Rainer W. <rwe...@ms...> - 2010-05-07 16:19:11
|
Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> writes: [...] > it also pretended that someone had already fixed the complexity of > the UID handling (which hasn't happened to the best of my knowledge; > I have started hacking a bit on it, but not sure if I'll make it, or > drop it and leave it for a later release using C++, if it turns out > it's too much of a hassle to do in C). I am done with my last 'firebrigade' assignment which means that I will now continue to work on the UID support for imap (which is presently at the state that it uses UIDNEXT to detect new mails while still using \Seen for determining their message sequence numbers and to distinguish between old and new mails). The UID code isn't really suitable for public consumption and won't become this without a major additional effort (and given that my regular worktime is presently around 53 hours/week, I won't have the time to do that). I will also hopefully be able to get rid of the linked-list representation for the POP3 UIDL database at latest until end of June (I hope), possibly earlier, and I would be willing to base this on a 'public' fetchmail-tree and share it if their was any interest in that (I am also supposed to work on a completely different project which is supposed to be demoed in June, but I think that I will be able to interleave both). |