From: Rob F. <rf...@fu...> - 2007-08-16 17:19:44
|
M. Fioretti wrote: > Rob wrote: > > Note that rejecting unqualified HELO values while being fully > > RFC compliant... > > Yes, we're aware of this and in _our_ particular case we should be > fine. For now, at least. Ideally in your smtpd restrictions you should tell postfix to permit_mynetworks *before* reject_non_fqdn_hostname and reject_invalid_hostname. And be sure mynetworks includes 127.0.0.0/8. > smtphost the.full.machine.name > > still yelds (may this depend on the fetchmail version???): > > fetchmail: SMTP> EHLO localhost I'm pretty sure this depends on the fetchmail version; a check of the NEWS file shows that there's been a lot of work on the smtphost feature since 6.2. OTOH the current man page doesn't seem to clearly talk about HELO/EHLO. -- ==============================| "A microscope locked in on one point Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> |Never sees what kind of room that it's in" http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind" |