From: M. F. <mfi...@ne...> - 2007-08-16 14:56:15
|
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 13:12:41 PM +0100, Rob MacGregor (rob...@gm...) wrote: > On 8/16/07, M. Fioretti <mfi...@ne...> wrote: > Please upgrade to 6.3.8 The one I reported is the default one in Centos 4.4, I'll try to have it upgraded asap, thanks. Not that it would make any difference wrt this problem, would it? Now: > > Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname > So, fix your postfix configuration As I mentioned in the original message, I cannot easily change (for reasons which are everything but technical...) the postfix configuration. Unless I *am* sure that it is really the only possible way to fix this, that is. Otherwise I would have posted straight to the postfix list. For the record, here is the complete excerpt of the postfix refusal I get _WITH_: poll pop3.myprovider.com with proto POP3 tracepolls user myaccount there with pass "the password" is root here keep smtpaddress exact_output_of_hostname_command_here Aug 16 14:41:55 machinename postfix/smtpd[5641]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 504 5.5.2 <localhost>: Helo command rejected: need fully-qualified hostname; from=<testaddress> to=<root@exact_output_of_hostname_command_here> proto=ESMTP helo=<localhost> I take this to mean that setting smtpaddress as above isn't enough to not make fetchmail send an helo different than localhost. Is this correct, and if yes, isn't there any other way to make fetchmail helo something else? With respect to this: > Having taken 2 seconds to consult the postfix documentation.. I suspect > you actually want to further consult the postfix documentation Generally, I have no problem at all to study man pages. The specific problem I have with email related docs is that it's really hard to figure out, unless one already knows the whole terminology and protocols in advance, to know what to search for. Even placing the whole error message in google, as I usually do, doesn't yeld much when email is concerned. I know this for a fact, that's why I also need a bit of pointers from mailing lists. Thanks for your patience, Marco -- Help *everybody* love Free Standards and Software: http://digifreedom.net |