From: Jelmer V. <je...@op...> - 2008-04-30 14:36:19
|
Hi Matthias, To quickly introduce myself: I'm one of the OpenChange developers and am mentoring Yangyan for the Summer of Code. Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 09:51 +0200 schrieb matthias.andreea: > The final issue I'd like to raise for this mail is that of licensing, > any third-party libraries should be GPLv2-compatible and > GPLv3-compatible and also AGPL-(Affero GPL) compatible so that I can > keep your parts should I rewrite major other parts of fetchmail and > maybe put them under the AGPL later on. > > Hope that helps as an early starting point. OpenChange is licensed under GPLv3 or later; in other words, incompatible with GPLv2-only licensed code but compatible with "GPLv2 or later" licensed code. Is this a problem? If it is, would it be acceptable if Yangyan's contributions were under these three licenses but not OpenChange? I imagine the support for MAPI would be a compile-time option anyway. Changing the OpenChange license is not really an option since it relies on Samba, which is GPLv3 or later as well. Cheers, Jelmer |