From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2008-01-17 13:31:42
|
Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 21:06 +0100 schrieb PaulTT: > > days, to be deleted, and it deletes only 1858 at a time, -not a > > problem, indeed, maybe it's even better, not to overwhlm the imap > > server- but it' not wanted, sigh....) > > yes, the problem is in the buf size for the server's answer, MSGBUFSIZE. > > is there a problem in increasing the buffer for that command? or maybe > could it be better to send multiple times the command until it ends > giving answers? "until it ends giving answers" is probably not the right approach, I'd rather split the whole transaction into smaller ones that delete some messages. -- Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> |