From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2007-08-23 12:27:54
|
On 8/23/07, Jakob Hirsch <jh...@pl...> wrote: > > The message "connect: Connection refused" you got with openssl sounds > more like it couldn't even connect to the server. It may be worth > tracing this problem with strace and tcpdump. > Is your main server publically reachable? It is, and it works fine (from the same host) with fetchmail or telnet. I'll have a closer look tomorrow night, but I'm pretty sure it's not a network problem :) > 0.9.8e is 6 months old, so I guess (or hope) it will be absorbed in the > next version of $DISTRIBUTION. But lots of people won't/don't upgrade working systems if they don't have to. Heck, I've got a Mandrake 9.0 box that's barely been touched since it was installed. > As Matthias pointed out, the fingerprint is suitable for that. > Don't get me wrong, I'm not against a "dump the server's cert" feature > in fetchmail, it could be handy. But I'm not sure that what you want to > do with it is The Right Thing. But then again, I didn't follow the > discussion which lead you to start this thread. I'm beginning to lean towards the view that the fingerprint is fine. I do think however that failed certificate verification should be handled the same way a failed password verification is - emailed notification upon the first occurrence. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |