From: Jason O. <jo...@ra...> - 2006-08-09 20:47:41
|
Matthias Andree wrote: > Jason Ostermann <jo...@ra...> writes: > > > Perhaps the reply to a CAPABILITY request can help with identifying the > server. > > What does Lotus respond to such a command? * OK IMAP Server Ready Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:11:19 -0500 a capability * CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 AUTH=PLAIN LITERAL+ NAMESPACE QUOTA UIDPLUS a OK CAPABILITY completed > > Another workaround idea: what if we check the received headers from the > RFC822.HEADERS request if it contains "MIME-Header: 1.0", and if it > does, but is missing Content-Transfer-Encoding, request the latter > explicitly and attach it to the headers if we get one? > > Such a workaround would reorder headers, but better that > than a missing quoted-printable or base64 tag. > > What do you think? > Sounds like a PITA to code. =( Would that fit into the current execution scheme of 1) request headers 2) read headers 3) request body 4) ready body?? Or, at least, would it fit any better than making a single header/body read version of imap? Jason |