From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2005-09-26 11:39:23
|
Nico Golde wrote: > * Matthias Andree <mat...@gm...> [2005-09-26 10:22]: > > Nico Golde <ni...@ng...> writes: > > > > > tags 329975 + upstream > > > > I think 6.2.9-rc5 can be uploaded to Debian's unstable distribution, so > > it gets more testing - after the upload please have Rémi retry with > > -rc5, if that works, another "fixed-upstream" tag might be in order. > > I will prepare an upload next week. I'm not sure how long I'll delay a 6.3.0 release. Perhaps I'll release 6.3.0 this week (given positive feedback and a few translations), perhaps I'll release it in four weeks (if new issues surface). > Is there something import I have to keep track on with the new package? Check the NEWS file, the important stuff is up front. --enable-inet6 has no effect any more, --enable-netsec (and the corresponding lines) are gone. Note that the set of translations shipped with fetchmails has changed - see po/LINGUAS for the current set. fetchmail now uses automake, and requires system gettext as build and run-time prerequisite (--with-included-gettext doesn't work, the intl/ directory isn't shipped). There's a new html file for the documentation, esrs-design-notes.html Otherwise, nothing I remember off-hand without checking. > > Does Debian compile 6.2.5 with --enable-inet6? If not, that might be the > > problem. > > fneq (,$(findstring IPV6,$(DEB_FETCHMAIL_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > FETCHCONFOPT += --enable-inet6 > endif > ifneq (,$(findstring IPV6SEC,$(DEB_FETCHMAIL_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > FETCHCONFOPT += --enable-inet6 --enable-netsec > endif I don't know sufficient context to judge whether this is the problem or isn't. I'm not going to touch 6.2.5 anyways unless someone offers a support contract with reasonable payment or evidence of a security problem that isn't configuration-borne or the environment's fault (kernel bug or such). Kind regards, -- Matthias Andree |