Re: [fetchmail-devel] sleep(3) @ pop3.c

[Matthias A. <mat...@gm...>]

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Rob Funk wrote:

> Yeah, I'm not at all suggesting we put the sleep back unless we discover an 
> in-use server that needs it.  And even then, detecting that server would be 
> best.

I'm even inclined to first try to have the server fixed, before
implementing workarounds.

fetchmail could then print a warning with a pointer to the solution
(knowledgebase, patch, etc.) that the user can forward to his ISP's
support division.

I believe in standards compliance.

-- 
Matthias Andree