Re: [fetchmail-devel] sleep(3) @ pop3.c

[Matthias A. <mat...@gm...>]

Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> writes:

> I'm not sure whether this is the Right Thing or not, but I'm pretty sure 
> that massive single-file mboxes are NOT the Right Thing, much less POP 
> servers that return +OK before they're really ready.

I'm willing to risk switching off this sleep() for reasons I posted to
fetchmail-friends, particularly insufficient information what this used
to be good for eight years ago. The software that needed the workaround
might be dead since 2001 or so... we need to try to find out
unfortunately.

-- 
Matthias Andree