From: Graham W. <gr...@mk...> - 2004-11-18 07:52:25
|
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:41:12AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > What about the implementation at [1]? The downside is that it doesn't > support a number of conversion characters (f, e, E, g, G, lc, ls, n), > none of which we seem to use though. There are a few other small things > missing which I don't think we use (or will) either. > > On the other hand, the source doesn't seem to be the derived from > Powell's implementation and the return semantics seem correct. The code > is also distributed in tarball form, so it seems updates would be easy > to track (though there hasn't been a release since late 2000 it seems). [1] http://www.ijs.si/software/snprintf/ -- gram |