[fetchmail-devel] Re: m4 directories?

[Graham W. <bo...@de...>]

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 10:48:02AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Graham Wilson <bo...@de...> writes:
> > Sorry for being persistent, I would just like to keep the tree as
> > organized as possible.
> 
> That's why I went with m4-local first :)

Well, if we are going to keep the M4 files seperate, we should use
m4-local, otherwise, we should just keep it in one file. Rob, what do
you think we should do?

More generally, I think the automake stuff should have been committed to
a branch, not to the trunk.

Rob identified that the goals for the next version of fetchmail was just
incoroporating the backlog of well-tested patches. I don't think the
automake stuff qualifies, and I think we should have spent more time
going over it. It is still possible to push the automake stuff to a
branch, and revert the changes from the trunk. I think that is what we
should do until after 6.2.6.

For 6.2.6, I think we need to get the repository looking as close to
esr's 6.2.5 tarball, plus the patches we have talked about.

-- 
gram