Re: [fetchmail-devel] list reply-to

[Rob F. <rf...@fu...>]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> writes:
> > But since these are new lists, it's reasonable to consider switching
> > to the "munge reply-to" setting.  Are there any preferences either
> > way?
>
> Yes, the answer is plain and simple "don't."
>
> Reply-To: serves no purpose makes replying off-list hard when there are
> valid reasons to reply off-list (for a chat or something), and it can
> cause embarrassment when the user's mailer doesn't warn the answer is
> redirected.

Well, I somewhat disagree, but I don't feel very strongly about it, so I'm 
fine with leaving it alone.

> <URL:http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>

Yeah, that's the well-known argument page I was referring to.
There's also a reply-to-helpful answering page, but I won't continue the 
argument. I was just checking. :-)

-- 
==============================|   "A microscope locked in on one point
 Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> |Never sees what kind of room that it's in"
 http://www.funknet.net/rfunk |    -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind"