Re: [fetchmail-devel] list reply-to

[Matthias A. <ma...@dt...>]

Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> writes:

> But since these are new lists, it's reasonable to consider switching to the 
> "munge reply-to" setting.  Are there any preferences either way?

Yes, the answer is plain and simple "don't."

Reply-To: serves no purpose makes replying off-list hard when there are
valid reasons to reply off-list (for a chat or something), and it can
cause embarrassment when the user's mailer doesn't warn the answer is
redirected.

<URL:http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95