From: Rob F. <rf...@fu...> - 2004-06-19 05:01:34
|
Matthias Andree wrote: > RPM v3 is still in use on supported SuSE versions, for instance 8.2, and > they have a nifty "patch RPM" feature for their online update - so it's > not old enough yet unfortunately. Bleh. > I'm not aware of RPM requiring "root" - that's just a matter of > permissions on directories and all that. RPM v3 supports BuildRoot and > all that is needed. Back when I ran Red Hat (around the same time I last programmed Berkeley DB :-), root was required for creating rpms so that the ownerships and permissions of the installed files would turn out right. Eric's "go root to make the rpm" release procedure is a remnant of that era, even though things have changed since then. > > One of my next steps was going to be removing the references to > > building the rpm as root. > > I'm looking forward to those changes. :-) Me too, but it'll have to wait until the end of the month. -- ==============================| "A microscope locked in on one point Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> |Never sees what kind of room that it's in" http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind" |