Re: [fetchmail-devel] Re: [fetchmail]fetchmail loaded into berlios svn repository; mailing lists

[Rob F. <rf...@fu...>]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> Makefile.in.in is a generated file.

In that case I guess we should remove it from svn.  I'm sure there are 
more.  (I've already noticed that some diffs and .orig/.rej files made it 
in there and should be removed.)

> gettext.info suggests listing the source file rather than a generated
> file, hence:
>
> Index: po/POTFILES.in
> ===================================================================
> --- po/POTFILES.in	(revision 3883)
> +++ po/POTFILES.in	(working copy)
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>  opie.c
>  options.c
>  pop3.c
> -rcfile_y.c
> +rcfile_y.y
>  report.c
>  rfc822.c
>  rpa.c

That looks good to me.

> > Argh.  autoconf is great for the user, but quite a pain for the
> > developer.
>
> The newer autoconf versions are better, but I wonder if you would want
> the bild super structure replaced, I'd suggest deferring that to 6.2.7.

Of course, one problem with removing generated files from svn is that we 
end up with different autoconf versions being used.  I have autoconf 2.59.

> I've commited the ok = 0 initialization in one change, the warning fixes
> in another and haven't yet committed the POTFILES.in patch, different
> suggestion above. It adds an xgettext warning but fixes the build.

It'd be nice to get rid of the warning if possible, but if the resulting 
code handles translation properly then it's probably no big deal.

-- 
==============================|   "A microscope locked in on one point
 Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> |Never sees what kind of room that it's in"
 http://www.funknet.net/rfunk |    -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind"