From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2006-07-10 23:25:43
|
[ Please don't CC me on list traffic ] On 7/10/06, Stephen Allen <fet...@ro...> wrote: > Rob MacGregor wrote: > > Have you considered using syslog instead of logfile? > > That would be a good idea if you could control more of what gets logged > there. At the moment, my fetchmail daemon runs every 180 seconds and > checks email from half-a-dozen POP3 servers. Most of it's log is filled > with: > > fetchmail: sleeping at Mon 10 Jul 2006 20:25:26 BST > fetchmail: awakened at Mon 10 Jul 2006 20:28:26 BST <---SNIP---> > However, I *do* want to see messages like: > > fetchmail: 1 message for us...@do... at POP3-1 (2353 octets). > fetchmail: reading message us...@do...@pop.isp.com:1 of 1 (2353 > octets) fetchmail: flushed > > As far as I know at the moment, it's all or nothing. For what you're after, yes. I'll admit that I only see log entries from fetchmail when things go wrong. Everything else would only be duplicating what my MTA logs anyway... However, if you run syslog-ng you could easily weed out the messages you don't want. I've done that on a number of systems, using the pattern matching to avoid logging pointless stuff. Probably easier than patching fetchmail, and arguing over what messages should go at what verbosity level :) -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |