From: Catalin R. <cat...@gm...> - 2006-05-09 12:23:54
|
On 5/8/06, Rob MacGregor <rob...@gm...> wrote: > On 5/8/06, Catalin Rotaru <cat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Oops, sorry about that. I just hit "Reply" without checking. My bad. I > > notice now that the list doesn't have a "Reply-To" header. Maybe one > > could be added? I am pretty sure MailMan supports it. Just an idea. > > This has been discussed before a number of times. There are as many > arguments for as against. It seems to be generally least harmful to > not set the Reply-to header - or at least setting it annoys the > developers :-) Got it. > > Aaah, I was afraid you'd say that. I am no Linux (and especially > > Fedora) expert and my preferred way of installing software is "yum > > install". I am afraid of breaking even more stuff I don't understand > > if I try to install from source on my own. > > Try re-installing via yum then. I've a suspicion your problem is > related to library version mismatches. It could be that once you've > logged in interactively enough environment is set so that it finds the > right libraries. > Tried. Sadly, that didn't fix it. I will try starting from the source and compiling. Is there any way to view and compare the "boot" and "regular" environments and libraries? > > Any pointers to where I can learn more about > > installing/removing/reinstalling fetchmail on Fedora? With all > > RedHat's idiosyncrasies and stuff? > > For that you'll have to look to the RH/Fedora lists/forums. I'll have > to admit to having only very limited experience of using RPMs etc. > Done - but now answers yet... Cata |