From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2006-01-08 22:13:20
|
Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> writes: > Matthias Andree wrote: >> BTW, can the list filters please be adjusted so as to ban + reject >> "fetchmail-users digest" in subjects? > > You do realize that under such a policy, your message (and this reply) > would be rejected.... :-) Yes, I do. It doesn't matter, because we don't have such list messages under such a policy. > Ah, but others here are. I don't see any need for any one person to look > at all the threads. I'm filtering such subjects now. If someone feels he's found a bug, he'll have to use a more catchy subject if he wants me to see the post (or perhaps file a bug at the berlios tracker). >> People with incapable mailers deserve to suffer more than >> those with capable mailers, and they can always switch to the plain >> version, or split the digest up with maildrop or procmail helper >> programs. > > On the -users list I don't see much reason for being too strict or telling > people they're using the wrong MUA. (This isn't linux-elitists, after > all.) I could see an argument for it on -devel, but it hasn't been an > issue there. It's impolite to send messages to lists with meaningless subjects, and people with inferior mailers and without a chance to split the digest up locally still have the option to switch their subscription to the "plain" format. -- Matthias Andree |