Re: [fetchmail-users] Re: unsafe MDA procmail recommended by fetchmail

[Thomas W. <to...@to...>]

I had confused:
>> # if procmail has reached here, delivery has failed. return with a
>> ...
> Fetchmail needs ...

Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> This is not a fetchmail issue and this whole discussion is unrelated to
> fetchmail. If you are really interested in improving procmail's error
> behaviour, you should move this to the procmail-list.
Sure, sorry for my confusion.

> As a sidenote: I doubt procmail is so bad, but you never know. Anyway, I used
> maildrop for quite a while. Main reason was its non-obfuscating filter
> language, but it also has a proper error handling. And I never needed anything
> like formail to use it as MDA.
Thanks for the hint, it looks promising.

Kind regards,
Thomas Wolff