From: Thomas W. <to...@to...> - 2005-11-10 12:38:47
|
I wrote: > But I've actually had similar problems a while ago; fetchmail couldn't > get past certain spam mails. I had to use a webmail interface to > delete them to get any further. Unfortunately, as I needed quick > access to my other mails, I did not care to retrieve any of those > (using the webmail interface) which I should have sent here for bug > analysis, sorry. mbarsalou (having a similar problem) wrote: > Subject: [fetchmail-users] fetchmail stopping on spam > ... > This is purely anecdotal, however. This problem occurred again yesterday and I have additional evidence now: reading message pt8...@po...:18 of 43 (1873 octets) . flushed reading message pt8...@po...:19 of 43 (1293 octets) fetchmail: incorrect header line found while scanning headers fetchmail: message delimiter found while scanning headers flushed fetchmail: client/server protocol error while fetching from pop.kundenserver.de fetchmail: Query status=4 (PROTOCOL) This was with fetchmail 6.2.3 and it stopped fetching mails at this point. There are two additional observations to note: * Although fetchmail said "flushed" for all the previous mails (and even the affected one, actually), it did not delete them from the server. * It left the affected message in the mailbox though (or at least some initial part of the headers) (domain name changed manually): Return-Path: <OCH...@no...> Delivery-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:25:36 +0100 Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.15.181] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.3) for root@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:13:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [83.242.73.87] (helo=host-n2-73-87.telpol.net.pl) by mx.kundenserver.de (node=mxeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKqIe-1EZWHr1aO4-0001NV for th...@xx...; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:25:31 +0100 Received: from peternixon.net [215.199.192.160 Then I switched to fetchmail 6.2.9rc7 and it fetched all mails as it should do, except the affected message, on which it still reported: fetchmail: message delimiter found while scanning headers What still concerns me, however, is that it discarded that message completely and wrote no trace of it to the mailbox, so messages with that kind of problem (whatever it may be) can not be checked or analysed anymore with fetchmail. Kind regards, Thomas Wolff |