Re: [fetchmail-users] Re: Want a "How can I use fetchmail with Gmail's POP3 servers?" FAQ?

[Charles L. <cha...@gm...>]

* On Sunday 2005-08-14 at 18:31:13 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> 
> You have send it broken...

Ok.  If it wasn't damaged, then we know it's
not the MUAs or the mail transport system.


> > What is the tool you are using that generates
> > this error?
> > Could it be this tool that's broken?
> > Are you using its latest version?
> 
> Yes

But what's the name and specific version of this
tool from which you quoted an error message?
I'd like to be able to duplicate this myself.


> and your file seems to be:
[...]
> which is definitivly broken.

The initial segment you quoted here is indeed
intact compared to the original.

I see nothing that's so obviously broken about
it, whether from an SGML or from an HTML point
of view.


> Many Webbrowser claims about it.

I have tested the following browsers and
they have no problem with it:  Firefox 1.0.6,
Konqueror 3.1.4, links 0.4.2, and w3m 0.4.1.


If the problem is at the SGML level, can you
pinpoint a specific SGML production that is not
respected by this code?

    <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SGML/productions.html>
    <ftp://ftp.ifi.uio.no/pub/SGML/productions>

Otherwise, if it's at the HTML level, can you
pinpoint something specific in the DTD (or in
the specification itself) that is not respected
by this code?

    <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd>
    <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/>


> Better you update your HTML generator.

This is handwritten.
Then successfully validated as I described using
online tools.

So I'd like to understand precisely what I am
doing wrong at the standards level, since I am
doing it manually entirely myself.