From: Anne W. <can...@go...> - 2007-08-26 23:10:54
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
I've been trying for almost two days to get a message through but they never appear. Anne |
From: Gerard S. <ge...@se...> - 2007-08-27 00:27:11
|
On Sunday August 26, 2007 at 05:10:23 (PM) Anne Wilson wrote: > I've been trying for almost two days to get a message through but they never > appear. > > Anne You do seem to be having a great deal of trouble; however, I am unsure as to what you are specifically referring to. All of the messages that you have sent have been received. At least it would appear to be so. Why do you think they are not? Are you failing to receive a copy of the message you sent returned to you via this group? If that is the problem, and I think it is, and you you are using GMail, and your address would indicates that you are, then that is your problem. Google had decreed that you do not have that right. When you send a message to a forum such as this, Google will not place that message in your in-box when it is relayed by the forum you sent the message to. It conveniently loses it. This is a well know and documented feature(?) of Google's email system. Might I suggest that you get a real email provider. Why not simply use your ISP's email service for starters. In any event, lose GMail. They are the worst service around. They even make 'Hotmail' look good. Actually, the new version <http://get.live.com/> isn't all that bad when compared to GMail. -- Gerard |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2007-08-27 10:41:01
|
On 8/26/07, Gerard Seibert <ge...@se...> wrote: > > Are you failing to receive a copy of the message you sent returned to > you via this group? If that is the problem, and I think it is, and you > you are using GMail, and your address would indicates that you are, > then that is your problem. Google had decreed that you do not have > that right. When you send a message to a forum such as this, Google > will not place that message in your in-box when it is relayed by the > forum you sent the message to. It conveniently loses it. This is a > well know and documented feature(?) of Google's email system. I call this one FUD. It isn't either well known, or documented (that I've ever found). I too am on GMail and I've never yet not received any email. I *have* seen quite a few list emails arrive in Junk however, until the system is trained. Now Hotmail, it *IS* documented that for Hotmail emails that MS view as "junk" are often just dropped on the floor. I've even confirmed this myself, more than once. The most important things here are: 1) Both Anne and I are on GMail, I'm seeing the emails fine 2) I've CCd Anne on 2 emails and emailed her direct on 2 - she hasn't responded to or seen any of these I'm strongly of the opinion that Anne is neglecting to check her Junk mail folder. I'll be trying a non GMail account to contact her later. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Gerard S. <ge...@se...> - 2007-08-27 18:04:22
|
On Monday August 27, 2007 at 04:40:33 (AM) Rob MacGregor wrote: > I call this one FUD. > > It isn't either well known, or documented (that I've ever found). I > too am on GMail and I've never yet not received any email. I *have* > seen quite a few list emails arrive in Junk however, until the system > is trained. > > Now Hotmail, it *IS* documented that for Hotmail emails that MS view > as "junk" are often just dropped on the floor. I've even confirmed > this myself, more than once. > > The most important things here are: > > 1) Both Anne and I are on GMail, I'm seeing the emails fine > 2) I've CCd Anne on 2 emails and emailed her direct on 2 - she hasn't > responded to or seen any of these > > I'm strongly of the opinion that Anne is neglecting to check her Junk > mail folder. I'll be trying a non GMail account to contact her later. How you can conceivably make a connection between the acronym FUD and the situation at hand is beyond me. Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled discussion. 1) Check out this URL: https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10314&topic=1566 Why your quest failed to turn it up is a mystery. 2) Where is this 'HOTMAIL' documentation? I am not a friend of Hotmail as a rule; however, I have experience far greater success with it than Google's lame offering. At Least IMHO, it exceeds GMail in it fuctionability. 3) The use of 'recent' in GMail will result in the user receiving a copy of every message that they send. Are you employing this technique? If you are not familiar with the 'recent' tag in GMail, Google for it. If you still cannot find it, contact me. For the record, I reiterate that her problem exists due to her reliance on a substandard web email system. -- Gerard |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2007-08-27 19:54:04
|
On 8/27/07, Gerard Seibert <ge...@se...> wrote: > > 1) Check out this URL: > > https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10314&topic=1566 > > Why your quest failed to turn it up is a mystery. Which isn't the main part of the problem Anne described > 2) Where is this 'HOTMAIL' documentation? I am not a friend of Hotmail > as a rule; however, I have experience far greater success with it than > Google's lame offering. At Least IMHO, it exceeds GMail in it > fuctionability. I've seen threads in many places, not least of which includes NANOG. > For the record, I reiterate that her problem exists due to her > reliance on a substandard web email system. It turns out we were both wrong :) -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2007-08-28 11:26:26
|
Gerard Seibert schrieb: > For the record, I reiterate that her problem exists due to her > reliance on a substandard web email system. Record taken. Could we kindly now return to fetchmail affairs and let the $LARGE_COMMERCIAL_MAIL_SITE_THAT_SNIFFS_YOUR_PERSONAL_MATTERS advocacy rest for a while? We know the large sites violate standards so they can tailor things to their business models and other policies, and we're usually not happy about that -- but this discussion has long since trodden off fetchmail paths. Thank you. |
From: Anne W. <can...@go...> - 2007-08-27 18:08:13
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
On Sunday 26 Aug 2007, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Sunday August 26, 2007 at 05:10:23 (PM) Anne Wilson wrote: > > I've been trying for almost two days to get a message through but they > > never appear. > > > > Anne > > You do seem to be having a great deal of trouble; however, I am unsure > as to what you are specifically referring to. All of the messages that > you have sent have been received. At least it would appear to be so. > Why do you think they are not? > > Are you failing to receive a copy of the message you sent returned to > you via this group? If that is the problem, and I think it is, and you > you are using GMail, and your address would indicates that you are, > then that is your problem. Google had decreed that you do not have > that right. When you send a message to a forum such as this, Google > will not place that message in your in-box when it is relayed by the > forum you sent the message to. It conveniently loses it. This is a > well know and documented feature(?) of Google's email system. > > Might I suggest that you get a real email provider. Why not simply use > your ISP's email service for starters. In any event, lose GMail. They > are the worst service around. They even make 'Hotmail' look good. > Actually, the new version <http://get.live.com/> isn't all that bad > when compared to GMail. I do have 'good' email providers - two, in fact. You are mistaken, too, in your comments about gmail. I always receive, forwarded to me for reading in kmail, copies of all messages I send to lists. The reason I use gmail for lists is quite simple - they manage to trap about half of the spam that comes through. Yes, I need to check their spam pages quite often, but there are few false-positives - I'd say about one in 200 at most. Thanks for trying to help, but it wasn't gmail's fault. Anne |