From: Rouven S. <rs...@bl...> - 2005-10-10 19:55:32
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Hello List! Are there any known issues that affect using fetchmail 6.2.5.2 to pop a Merak Mail Server (7.4.5)? I am experiencing problems with fetchmail not recognizing and fetching new messages on that mail server which other MUA have no problem at all to see and fetch. fetchmail (debian sarge binary) runs in daemon mode on my site, using the following config: set postmaster "postmaster" set bouncemail set properties "" poll mail.domain.tld uidl with proto POP3 user "us...@do...d" there with password "password" is user here options keep Fetchmails "blindness" disappears when new messages hit that mailbox. A successfull dialog looks as follows: fetchmail: POP3> CAPA fetchmail: POP3< +OK Capability list follows fetchmail: POP3< TOP fetchmail: POP3< USER fetchmail: POP3< APOP fetchmail: POP3< EXPIRE NEVER fetchmail: POP3< UIDL fetchmail: POP3< SASL CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN fetchmail: POP3< . fetchmail: POP3> AUTH CRAM-MD5 fetchmail: POP3< + PDIwMDUxMDEwMTk0NzM5QG1haWwucm91dGluZy5uZXQ+ fetchmail: POP3> YW5kcmVhcy5lZ25lckBsb2N6b25lLmRlIDYxMDBmY2MyMjZiNmVmMDM5YjIxYzRiNDNkNDhmYjk1 fetchmail: POP3< +OK 1 messages 10918 octets I haven't logged a session that fails, yet, and i am hesitating to do so since fetchmail outputs quite a lot in verbose mode and the errors appear in unpredictable ways. Thanks in advance, Rouven Sacha |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2005-10-10 20:40:27
|
On 10/10/05, Rouven Sacha <rs...@bl...> wrote: > Hello List! > > Are there any known issues that affect using fetchmail 6.2.5.2 to pop a > Merak Mail Server (7.4.5)? I am experiencing problems with fetchmail not > recognizing and fetching new messages on that mail server which other > MUA have no problem at all to see and fetch. If you are sharing the mailbox with other mail clients then you MUST use UIDL support. -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Rob F. <rf...@fu...> - 2005-10-10 20:43:56
|
Rouven Sacha wrote: > Are there any known issues that affect using fetchmail 6.2.5.2 to pop a > Merak Mail Server (7.4.5)? I've never even heard of Merak Mail Server myself.... > I am experiencing problems with fetchmail > not recognizing and fetching new messages on that mail server which > other MUA have no problem at all to see and fetch. Are you normally checking the mailbox with other clients also? You could try the fetchall option, or the uidl option. Read about those in the man page. > I haven't logged a session that fails, yet, and i am hesitating to do > so since fetchmail outputs quite a lot in verbose mode and the errors > appear in unpredictable ways. We can't see what's wrong from a successful log. We can only see what's going wrong from an unsuccessful log. -- ==============================| "A microscope locked in on one point Rob Funk <rf...@fu...> |Never sees what kind of room that it's in" http://www.funknet.net/rfunk | -- Chris Mars, "Stuck in Rewind" |
From: Rob F. <rf...@fu...> - 2005-10-11 14:56:34
|
Please keep list mail on the list..... Rouven Sacha wrote: > Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Rob Funk: > > I've never even heard of Merak Mail Server myself.... > > http://www.icewarp.com/ > > > Are you normally checking the mailbox with other clients also? > > You could try the fetchall option, or the uidl option. Read about > > those in the man page. > > I have to keep the messages on the server, due to the fact that other > clients have to have access to these messages as well. And if i do > understand things right, "fetchall" conflicts with "keep". > > The Debian manpage of fetchmail calls the UIDL code "flaky". Since the > manpage seems to be outdated (it is pointing to esr's homepage, for > example): is UIDL still flaky in 6.2.5.2? > > > We can't see what's wrong from a successful log. We can only see > > what's going wrong from an unsuccessful log. > > I'm running fetchmail in Debian's debug-run mode right now. I'm going > to post updates as soon as i get them. |
From: Rouven S. <rs...@bl...> - 2005-10-11 10:10:20
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 14:43 -0400 schrieb Rob Funk: > I've never even heard of Merak Mail Server myself.... http://www.icewarp.com/ > Are you normally checking the mailbox with other clients also? > You could try the fetchall option, or the uidl option. Read about > those in the man page. I have to keep the messages on the server, due to the fact that other clients have to have access to these messages as well. And if i do understand things right, "fetchall" conflicts with "keep". The Debian manpage of fetchmail calls the UIDL code "flaky". Since the manpage seems to be outdated (it is pointing to esr's homepage, for example): is UIDL still flaky in 6.2.5.2? > We can't see what's wrong from a successful log. We can only see > what's going wrong from an unsuccessful log. I'm running fetchmail in Debian's debug-run mode right now. I'm going to post updates as soon as i get them. -- Rouven Sacha | Blinkenlichten GbR | 0174/4220127 | fax: 030/13896249 |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2005-10-11 17:11:21
|
On 11/10/05, Rouven Sacha <rs...@bl...> wrote: > I have to keep the messages on the server, due to the fact that other > clients have to have access to these messages as well. And if i do > understand things right, "fetchall" conflicts with "keep". Certainly a Bad Idea :-) > The Debian manpage of fetchmail calls the UIDL code "flaky". Since the > manpage seems to be outdated (it is pointing to esr's homepage, for > example): is UIDL still flaky in 6.2.5.2? I've been running one mail server that polls half a dozen remote mailboxes (about to jump to a couple of dozen) using UIDL for nearly 3 years now. I've never had a problem with UIDL support. Alternatively, put it this way - you have no choice. You can either enable UIDL support or try to find another solution that doesn't use fetchmail :) -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2006-01-08 22:40:16
|
Rob MacGregor <rob...@gm...> writes: > Alternatively, put it this way - you have no choice. You can either > enable UIDL support or try to find another solution that doesn't use > fetchmail :) Only that the other solution would also have to use fetchall+nokeep approaches or UIDL... -- Matthias Andree |