From: Asif I. <va...@gm...> - 2009-06-14 14:55:15
|
Is there a chance that fetchmail will add support for mapi? I see openmapi and openchange offers some APIs to access mapi servers. Our work exchange server only offers access by mapi or https interface. Thanks -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
From: Rob M. <rob...@gm...> - 2009-06-14 17:44:54
|
Please look at the list archives. This topic has just been discussed. On 06/14/2009, Asif Iqbal <va...@gm...> wrote: > Is there a chance that fetchmail will add support for mapi? > > I see openmapi and openchange offers some APIs to access mapi servers. > > Our work exchange server only offers access by mapi or https interface. > > Thanks > > -- > Asif Iqbal > PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > _______________________________________________ > fetchmail-devel mailing list > fet...@li... > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-devel > -- Please keep list traffic on the list. Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he doesn't become a monster. Friedrich Nietzsche |
From: Jelmer V. <je...@op...> - 2009-06-14 22:02:14
|
Asif Iqbal wrote: > Is there a chance that fetchmail will add support for mapi? > > I see openmapi and openchange offers some APIs to access mapi servers. > > Our work exchange server only offers access by mapi or https interface. > There is a MAPI branch for fetchmail that was created by a summer of code student a year ago, which adds MAPI support based on OpenChange. Hopefully this branch will be merged back into mainline at some point. I'm happy to help get it to compile against current openchange again, or help testing. Cheers, Jelmer |
From: Matthias A. <mat...@gm...> - 2009-06-15 09:07:13
|
Am 14.06.2009, 14:58 Uhr, schrieb Jelmer Vernooij <je...@op...>: > Asif Iqbal wrote: >> Is there a chance that fetchmail will add support for mapi? >> >> I see openmapi and openchange offers some APIs to access mapi servers. >> >> Our work exchange server only offers access by mapi or https interface. >> > There is a MAPI branch for fetchmail that was created by a summer of > code student a year ago, which adds MAPI support based on OpenChange. > > Hopefully this branch will be merged back into mainline at some point. > > I'm happy to help get it to compile against current openchange again, or > help testing. Hi Jelmer, could you check Mojmir Svoboda's mails of 09/10 June on this list? Some issues he has seen may be related to OpenChange updates that entailed API changes. I'm sorry that I neither got around to auditing the code, nor integrating it yet. I plan to release 6.3.10 soonish there is one non-trivial fix pending, but I can branch for 6.3.10 to fix up the fallout through release candidates, and after that continue towards a new feature branch (6.4.X), merging the code if I can get it tested. Best regards Matthias -- Matthias Andree |
From: Asif I. <va...@gm...> - 2009-06-15 13:49:33
|
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Matthias Andree<mat...@gm...> wrote: > Am 14.06.2009, 14:58 Uhr, schrieb Jelmer Vernooij <je...@op...>: > >> Asif Iqbal wrote: >>> >>> Is there a chance that fetchmail will add support for mapi? >>> >>> I see openmapi and openchange offers some APIs to access mapi servers. >>> >>> Our work exchange server only offers access by mapi or https interface. >>> >> There is a MAPI branch for fetchmail that was created by a summer of >> code student a year ago, which adds MAPI support based on OpenChange. >> >> Hopefully this branch will be merged back into mainline at some point. >> >> I'm happy to help get it to compile against current openchange again, or >> help testing. > > Hi Jelmer, > > could you check Mojmir Svoboda's mails of 09/10 June on this list? Some > issues he has seen may be related to OpenChange updates that entailed API > changes. > > I'm sorry that I neither got around to auditing the code, nor integrating it > yet. I plan to release 6.3.10 soonish there is one non-trivial fix pending, > but I can branch for 6.3.10 to fix up the fallout through release > candidates, and after that continue towards a new feature branch (6.4.X), > merging the code if I can get it tested. Please let me know if I can help with the test. I have access to exchange server. > > Best regards > Matthias > > -- > Matthias Andree > -- Asif Iqbal PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |