Re: [Feedreader-development] Atom support hack

[Nicole S. <ni...@gn...>]

Jim McKeeth <ji...@mc...> wrote:
>This is kind of a hack, but what do you think?  

I think this is a very nice idea for the moment.

Atom can't be that complicated. :o) As far as I understood we have to do
rss 2.00 anyway and this is different from .92 and 1.0. Seems to me - but
I am aware that I am not development - that this is "easy" and has to be
seperate modules anyway.

For the meantime: people using FR like using it for several reasons. They
don't like fr not to support atom. They don't like things like 'you can go
there and change this link plus plus plus' It has to be easy.

This is what you suggest - make it easy to use Atom right from FR. So this
seems like a good idea. BUT we have to state that this is the temporary
thing because Atom is going to be in it.

Toomas, Karsten, how about releasing a build? Or at least put entry on the
page which does not start with the date 2002? And perhaps name it 'take our
very stable beta except you have many feeds' :o)

Nicole




	
-- 
http://www.useful-sounds.de/ - http://beissholz.de