Thread: [Feedreader-development] Biggest problem in feedreader
Brought to you by:
toomastoots
From: Toomas T. <to...@i-...> - 2003-12-10 08:29:47
|
Hello! My hope in Feedreader has raised again. Bugfixes and stuff... :) Big thanks to developers. I use Feedreader daily myself. And that leads us to my biggest problem. I have about 60 feeds subscribed. But sometimes GETting some feeds does not work. Webserver does not give error but only stays in status "Connected". So it's quite common that i go to work in the morning and see that those progressbars in lower right corner are partly green and updating progress is not ended. But if I press "update" button, it does not do anything (because software knows/thinks that update is going on). Only possibility is to restart feedreader. I think that feedreader has to have some kind of timeout management. So that thread could not have more than 5 minutes off running time for example. I'm not quite at home with threads programming and stopping them. Has anyboyd some neat ideas? :) Greetings Toomas |
From: Karsten H. <mai...@kh...> - 2003-12-10 08:43:52
|
Hi, Toomas Toots wrote: > Hello! > > My hope in Feedreader has raised again. Bugfixes and stuff... :) Big > thanks to developers. > > I use Feedreader daily myself. And that leads us to my biggest problem. > I have about 60 feeds subscribed. But sometimes GETting some feeds does 60 feeds?!?! Are you a newsjunkie? (just kidding ;) > not work. Webserver does not give error but only stays in status > "Connected". So it's quite common that i go to work in the morning and Is this the same server everytime? > see that those progressbars in lower right corner are partly green and You have green progressbars?!? > updating progress is not ended. But if I press "update" button, it does > not do anything (because software knows/thinks that update is going on). > Only possibility is to restart feedreader. > > I think that feedreader has to have some kind of timeout management. So > that thread could not have more than 5 minutes off running time for > example. I'm not quite at home with threads programming and stopping them. > > Has anyboyd some neat ideas? :) > I will examine how the update works and look for the best way to implement such a timeout management. Greetings, Karsten (khoffrath) |
From: Nicole S. <ni...@gn...> - 2003-12-10 09:57:06
|
Karsten Hoffrath <mai...@kh...> wrote: >60 feeds?!?! Are you a newsjunkie? (just kidding ;) Oh it would be nice if we could count them some easier than sorting and editing the file in an editor *g* Nicole, 300. :) -- http://www.useful-sounds.de/ - http://beissholz.de |
From: Karsten H. <mai...@kh...> - 2003-12-10 10:06:10
|
Nicole Simon wrote: > Karsten Hoffrath <mai...@kh...> wrote: > >>60 feeds?!?! Are you a newsjunkie? (just kidding ;) > > > Oh it would be nice if we could count them some easier than sorting and > editing the file in an editor *g* > > Nicole, 300. :) > Like an entry in the popupmenu? Karsten, 26 (+2 feeds for tests). |
From: Nicole S. <ni...@gn...> - 2003-12-10 10:21:53
|
Karsten Hoffrath <mai...@kh...> wrote: >Like an entry in the popupmenu? For example :o) Or a nice little statistik report *g* Nicole -- http://www.useful-sounds.de/ - http://beissholz.de |
From: Karsten H. <mai...@kh...> - 2003-12-10 10:26:07
|
Nicole Simon wrote: > Karsten Hoffrath <mai...@kh...> wrote: > >>Like an entry in the popupmenu? > > > For example :o) Or a nice little statistik report *g* Arrgh, but not for the next release ;) Karsten |
From: Toomas T. <to...@i-...> - 2003-12-10 10:28:00
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body> This menu should popup then clicking in "My feeds" item. At the moment there are already "mark all headlines read". By the way, there are two commands called "mark all headlines as read" but they do different things. Beware of that :) In future we should get rid of one of them. My implementation makes read only the feed what is active (or all feeds if "my feeds" is active"). Another implementation makes read all headlines everywhere. I thing that my implementation is a little bit better.<br> <br> <br> Greetings<br> Toomas<br> <br> Nicole Simon wrote: <blockquote cite="mid...@ma..." type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Karsten Hoffrath <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mai...@kh..."><mai...@kh...></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Like an entry in the popupmenu? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> For example :o) Or a nice little statistik report *g* Nicole </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html> |
From: Karsten H. <mai...@kh...> - 2003-12-10 10:59:52
|
Toomas Toots wrote: > This menu should popup then clicking in "My feeds" item. At the moment > there are already "mark all headlines read". By the way, there are two > commands called "mark all headlines as read" but they do different > things. Beware of that :) In future we should get rid of one of them. > My implementation makes read only the feed what is active (or all feeds > if "my feeds" is active"). Another implementation makes read all > headlines everywhere. I thing that my implementation is a little bit better. > I second this. What would be nice also, is a possibility to mark all feeds in a folder as read. Greetings, Karsten (khoffrath) |
From: Nicole S. <ni...@gn...> - 2003-12-10 21:30:45
|
[please use plaintext :o)] Toomas Toots <to...@i-...> wrote: >My implementation makes read only the feed what is active (or all feeds >if "my feeds" is active"). But in line with good usability - only with an extra question "You are about to mark all feeds read - continue?" :o)) Nicole -- http://www.useful-sounds.de/ - http://beissholz.de |