Re: [fbtunnel-discuss] multiple tunnels from one linux box

[Barry H. <ba...@hi...>]

On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 21:43, Rick Payne wrote:
> --On Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:21 pm +0100 Barry Higgins 
> <ba...@hi...> wrote:
> 
> > I've managed to blunder my way through the code and be able to change
> > the tunnel ID but then I get the "can't bind to socket" error if i run
> > more than one instance of fbtunnel. Perfectly understandable error, just
> > beyond my knowledge to fix :(
> 
> I've not done anything to make it handle multiple tunnels yet. I've always 
> assumed that it would be used at the 'client' end talking to a firebrick.
> 
> I don't think its too hard to add 'multiple tunnel' support - there are 
> some wrinkles with adding a reasonable configuration file and the like.
> 
> Can you describe what you're trying to do more fully, and I'll see what I 
> can do.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rick
> 

In a nutshell, setup downlink adsl bonding from AAISP.net. The method is
(as I understand it) to have 2 fb105's, 1 at their end the other at my
end. Tunnels are then created down each adsl link and 'bonded'.
I have a fb105 setup and installed at their end, my aim is now to create
a linux router at my end to basically simulate the fb105's tunneling
setup.

Hope this makes some sort of sense.

Barry