Hallo,
An empty ENUM, TYPE or UNION would be nice!! :)
Gruß chapilinsky
Why do you think you need that?
Do you know about the TYPE (alias) statement?
a void type instruction is already useful.
if I no variable in my construct I would also not need to declare! And type alias is hardly an alternative!
Even in times of 8 GB and more necessary to not waste memory.
Sorry, I don't understand. (Where's the answer to my why question?)
Trying again: What's the difference between your 'empty ENUM, TYPE or UNION' and
TYPE AS ANY empty_ENUM_TYPE_or_UNION
???
was gibt es nicht zu versehen?
type Foo declare sub bar() end type
und gut ist! Da muss keine Variable sein kenne. Ist in GNU gcc auch möglich!
So you're speaking about an interface?
TYPE Foo bar AS SUB() END TYPE ' (und gut ist!)
OK, and how is this related to ENUM and UNION?
nothing!
Log in to post a comment.
Why do you think you need that?
Do you know about the TYPE (alias) statement?
a void type instruction is already useful.
if I no variable in my construct I would also not need to declare! And type alias is hardly an alternative!
Even in times of 8 GB and more necessary to not waste memory.
Sorry, I don't understand. (Where's the answer to my why question?)
Trying again: What's the difference between your 'empty ENUM, TYPE or UNION' and
TYPE AS ANY empty_ENUM_TYPE_or_UNION
???
was gibt es nicht zu versehen?
type Foo
declare sub bar()
end type
und gut ist! Da muss keine Variable sein kenne.
Ist in GNU gcc auch möglich!
So you're speaking about an interface?
TYPE Foo
bar AS SUB()
END TYPE ' (und gut ist!)
OK, and how is this related to ENUM and UNION?
nothing!