RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: e100 frame reception test res ult draft.

[Gao, K. <kev...@in...>]

Now I have update the faultset file of e100 tese code. 
Add a base parameters for all the faultset.
You could only change the base address to your e100 
bar address.
Furthermore, the fith-tool newest version is needed.
please goto fith-toll/fith-utility directory to update it.

-Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis Zhuang [mailto:lou...@li...] 
Sent: 2003?2?21? 8:40
To: Mark Haverkamp
Cc: Kevin Gao; FI...@ta...
Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: e100 frame reception test res
ult draft.


The address is e100 device BAR0+2 (MMIO base address). In e100 hardware
spec, the address is for cu command register. Please lspci to get your
e100 MMIO base address.
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 01:58, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> Sorry to keep bothering you guys, Now that I'm past the previous test, I
> started looking at the e100 code just posted.  I did a bk pull of the
> fith-tool directory and built the e100 fault set code.   I tried the
> example in you mail and just my luck, it didn't seem to work.
> 
> I am getting: pf_arm: Reason: Address is not present.
> 
> Looking at scb_cu_resume.fsml, the trigger address is 0xfb101002.
> What is this address?   Does it depend on which pci slot the card is
> plugged into?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 23:01, Gao, Kevin wrote:
> > I have submitted all the test code of e100 into sourceforge.
> > You can download the as
> > bk://fau...@fa.../fith-tool/
> > 
> > The test code is in the directory: ./fith-tool/fith_test/fault_set/e100.
> > Using example:
> > insert module : fi_core, fi_pf, e100, 
> > # cd ./fith-tool/fith_test/fault_set/e100
> > #make
> > # insmod scb_cu_resume.ko
> > # ficl -i scb_cu_resume.fsml
> > # /etc/init.d/network start
> > 
> > Now use command dmesg to see the log info or see the message in 
> > /var/log/messages.
> > 
> > -Kevin
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Louis Zhuang [mailto:lou...@li...] 
> > Sent: 2003?2?20? 8:26
> > To: Mark Haverkamp
> > Cc: Rusty Lynch; Stanley Wang; Kevin Gao; Frank Wang; FITHML
> > Subject: Re: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: e100 frame reception test
> > result draft.
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 00:26, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > > If that includes the code too, that would be great.  I'm interested in
> > > seeing how a test of a driver is implemented.
> > As you wish, test code are there (and simple). ;-)
> >   - Louis
-- 
Yours truly,
Louis Zhuang
---------------
Fault Injection Test Harness Project
BK tree: http://fault-injection.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
Home Page: http://sf.net/projects/fault-injection