[Fwd: Re: [Fault-injection-developer] Remove kprobes dependency of kprobes?]

[Louis Z. <lou...@li...>]

-----Forwarded Message-----

> From: Louis Zhuang <lou...@li...>
> To: Rusty Lynch <ru...@li...>
> Cc: FITHML, Frank Wang <fra...@in...>
> Subject: Re: [Fault-injection-developer] Remove kprobes dependency of kprobes?
> Date: 19 Feb 2003 08:53:09 +0800
> 
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 02:22, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> 
> > It case that was as clear as mud, our bk trees (with the current kprobes
> > dependency) would look like:
> > 
> > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5
> >               || 
> > 	      ||------------------------------------------------
> >               ||                                               ||
> >               \/(pulls from)                                   ||
> > bk://fau...@fa.../fi             ||
> >               ||                                               \/ (pulls from)
> >               ||      bk://fau...@fa.../kprobes
> >               ||                     ||
> >               ||                     ||
> >               \/(pulls from)         \/(pulls from)
> > bk://fau...@fa.../fi-kprobes
> Cool! It is already a truth in my local development machine. I'd like to
> see that... IMHO, I'd like to split more trees, for example, 
> original linux-2.5 =======> fi1 ===============||
>                       ||                       ||===> fi-all
> 		      ||==> kprobes ==> fi2 ===||
> 
> fi1 tree is the FITH stuffs independent, fi2 tree is FITH stuffs
> dependent on kprobes, fi-all is only an integrated tree.
> 
>   - Louis
> 
-- 
Yours truly,
Louis Zhuang
---------------
Fault Injection Test Harness Project
BK tree: http://fault-injection.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
Home Page: http://sf.net/projects/fault-injection