Re: [Fault-injection-developer] New fith-mini-9 is released
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
rustyl
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Fault-injection-developer] New fith-mini-9 is released
|
From: Rusty L. <ru...@li...> - 2002-11-27 02:30:11
|
If you have a patch that depends on feature X, then base your work on
a tree that has feature X and create a patch for feature X and a patch
for the code that uses feature X.
If you just plan on someday using feature X, but are not using yet, then
do not base what you are doing on a tree that is polluted with that feature.
(Well, in all reality you can do what you want in your own source tree,
just do not let that code pollute patches that you submit.)
-rusty
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zhuang, Louis" <lou...@in...>
To: "'Rusty Lynch'" <ru...@li...>; "FITHML (E-mail)"
<fau...@so...>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] New fith-mini-9 is released
> In minimal FITH, we'd like to show something that kprobes can not do but
> FITH can. It is page fault interceptor.
> Other not-included interceptors did use kprobes but much easier than
kprobes
> indeed. We'd like to put them into successor patches.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rusty Lynch [mailto:ru...@li...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:22 AM
> > To: Zhuang, Louis; 'Rusty Lynch'; FITHML (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: [Fault-injection-developer] New fith-mini-9 is released
> >
> >
> > Am I missing something here? There isn't a single kprobe or
> > kwatch call in
> > any of your code. If you are not using kprobes or kwatch
> > then why are you
> > going through all the trouble to make your patchs apply on top of it?
> >
> > -rusty
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Zhuang, Louis" <lou...@in...>
> > To: "'Rusty Lynch'" <ru...@li...>; "FITHML (E-mail)"
> > <fau...@so...>
> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:30 PM
> > Subject: [Fault-injection-developer] New fith-mini-9 is released
> >
> >
> > > Cut one level direction
> > > Add a simple README.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rusty Lynch [mailto:ru...@li...]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:54 AM
> > > > To: Zhuang, Louis; Lynch, Rusty; 'Rusty Lynch';
> > FITHML (E-mail)
> > > > Subject: Re: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: [PATCH 0/3]
> > > > FITH patch against 2.5.47
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So I guess you are saying that you have something like:
> > > > /a/a1/linux/
> > > > /b/b1/linux/
> > > >
> > > > and you want to build a patch without having to make the
> > > > rest of the world
> > > > reproduce the directory structure you happen to be using?
> > > >
> > > > Why not just add a symbolic link to b/b1/linux, so:
> > > >
> > > > cd /a/a1
> > > > ln -s /b/b1/linux hacked_linux
> > > >
> > > > and then create you patch by
> > > > cd /a/a1/
> > > > patch -urN linux hacked_linux
> > > >
> > > > -rusty
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Zhuang, Louis" <lou...@in...>
> > > > To: "Lynch, Rusty" <rus...@in...>; "'Rusty Lynch'"
> > > > <ru...@li...>; "FITHML (E-mail)"
> > > > <fau...@so...>
> > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:40 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: [PATCH 0/3]
> > > > FITH patch against
> > > > 2.5.47
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, it's a good convention. There are two level
> > > > directory just because of
> > > > > my development hierarchy. Do you have some utilities
> > > > which can reduce the
> > > > > level of hierarchy of patch? :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Lynch, Rusty
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:38 AM
> > > > > > To: Zhuang, Louis; 'Rusty Lynch'; FITHML (E-mail)
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE:
> > [PATCH 0/3]
> > > > > > FITH patch against 2.5.47
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, thanks. BTW, patches should normally
> > apply from the
> > > > > > kernel root, not one directory above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In other words, if someone hands you over a
> > patch for the
> > > > > > kernel, you should be able to apply
> > > > > > the patch by:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > $ cd YOURKERNELROOT
> > > > > > $ patch -p1 < PATH_TO_PATCH/somepatch.diff
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -rusty
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Zhuang, Louis [mailto:lou...@in...]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 4:22 PM
> > > > > > To: 'Rusty Lynch'; Zhuang, Louis; FITHML (E-mail)
> > > > > > Subject: [Fault-injection-developer] RE:
> > [PATCH 0/3] FITH
> > > > > > patch against 2.5.47
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All patch files are included in fith-mini-8.tgz
> > > > > >
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fault-injection/fith-mi
> > > > > > ni-8.tgz?download
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Rusty Lynch [mailto:ru...@li...]
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:41 AM
> > > > > > > To: Zhuang, Louis; FITHML (E-mail)
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Fault-injection-developer]
> > > > [PATCH 0/3] FITH
> > > > > > > patch against
> > > > > > > 2.5.47
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Louis, your emailer seems to have messed up the
> > > > > > patch files by
> > > > > > > adding new lines. Could you put them up on
> > > > a public server
> > > > > > > (like maybe the sourceforge site) if
> > you are having
> > > > > > problems
> > > > > > > posting a patchfile that doesn't get corrupted?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -rustyl
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Zhuang, Louis" <lou...@in...>
> > > > > > > To: "FITHML (E-mail)"
> > > > > > <fau...@so...>
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:02 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: [Fault-injection-developer] [PATCH
> > > > 0/3] FITH
> > > > > > > patch against 2.5.47
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > > > We'd like to put these patches as minimal
> > > > as possible
> > > > > > > in order to
> > > > > > > > give more feedback.
> > > > > > > > Any comments, especially about the addon
> > > > patches welcome.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Louis
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Fault-injection-developer mailing list
> > > > > > > >
> > Fau...@li...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fault-injecti
> > > > > > on-developer
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm
> > Tungsten T
> > > > > handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> > > > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Fault-injection-developer mailing list
> > > > > Fau...@li...
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fault-injecti
> > > > on-developer
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
> > > handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> > > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fault-injection-developer mailing list
> > > Fau...@li...
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fault-injection-developer
|
