RE: [Fault-injection-developer] How is the patched insmod making module_list available

[Lynch, R. <rus...@in...>]

Actually, it's fakeirq.o, not fith_fakeirq.  (hmm... maybe the 
build script that I tossed out the window is moving fakeirq.o 
to fith_fakeirq.o? It doesn't matter... I'm just getting a feel
for the code.)

* NOTE: Keep in mind I hacked out the need for the symbols your
        kernel patch was depending on.

[rusty@penguin2 rusty]$ sudo /sbin/insmod fakeirq
Using
/lib/modules/2.5.44-ac2/kernel/drivers/faultinjection/fakeirq/fakeirq.o
/lib/modules/2.5.44-ac2/kernel/drivers/faultinjection/fakeirq/fakeirq.o:
unresolved symbol module_list

I can add all kinds of unresolved symbols to a module and fith_insmod 
is happy to install the module.

	-rusty

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhuang, Louis 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:37 PM
To: Lynch, Rusty
Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] How is the patched insmod
making module_list available


Rusty,
	Did you mean you can not insert fith_fakeirq by normal insmod?

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Lynch, Rusty 
    > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:17 AM
    > To: Zhuang, Louis; Lynch, Rusty
    > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] How is the 
    > patched insmod making module_list available
    > 
    > 
    > What's there to log? /sbin/insmod fails because of an 
    > undefined symbol, module_list.
    > 
    > Although it looks like it has nothing to do with 2.5.44.  
    > I think the patched insmod 
    > just doesn't catch the fact that module_list is not 
    > defined. Kind of a side effect?
    > 
    > 	-rusty
    > 
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Zhuang, Louis 
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:11 PM
    > To: Lynch, Rusty
    > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] How is the patched insmod
    > making module_list available
    > 
    > 
    > We have not a try for 2.5.44... could you give us your error log?
    > 
    >     > -----Original Message-----
    >     > From: Lynch, Rusty [mailto:rus...@in...]
    >     > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:02 AM
    >     > To: 'fau...@so...'
    >     > Subject: [Fault-injection-developer] How is the patched 
    >     > insmod making module_list available
    >     > 
    >     > 
    >     > I'm checking out the code and trying to get fakeirq.c to 
    >     > compile with the
    >     > 2.5.44 kernel, but have an unresolved symbol for 
    >     > "module_list" unless I use
    >     > the patched insmod.
    >     > 
    >     > What's up with that?  It looks like all that was changed 
    >     > in the insmod
    >     > source tree was insmod.c, and I don't see anything having 
    >     > to do with
    >     > "module_list".
    >     > 
    >     > 	-rusty 
    >     > 
    >     > 
    >     > -------------------------------------------------------
    >     > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
    >     > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
    >     > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
    >     > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en
    >     > 
    >     > _______________________________________________
    >     > Fault-injection-developer mailing list
    >     > Fau...@li...
    >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fault-injecti
    > on-developer
    >