RE: [Fault-injection-developer] Couple of issues downloading and building the FITH source code

[Zhuang, L. <lou...@in...>]

FITH has nothing to do with CGLE indeed except for some reference to
hardened driver spec. :-) We'll eliminate all references for CGLE in
documents.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Zhuang, Louis 
    > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:55 AM
    > To: 'Rob Rhoads'; Zhuang, Louis
    > Cc: fau...@li...; 
    > Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky; Wang, Frank
    > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] Couple of issues 
    > downloading and building the FITH source code
    > 
    > 
    > I agree totally. We'll change README and INSTALL against 
    > stock kernel 2.4/2.5. 
    > 
    >     > -----Original Message-----
    >     > From: Rob Rhoads [mailto:err...@li...]
    >     > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:53 AM
    >     > To: Zhuang, Louis
    >     > Cc: fau...@li...; 
    >     > Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky; 'Rob Rhoads'; Wang, Frank
    >     > Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] Couple of issues 
    >     > downloading and building the FITH source code
    >     > 
    >     > 
    >     > On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 19:27, Zhuang, Louis wrote:
    >     > > Thanks Rob for his push! :) 
    >     > > We've made FITH conformable to Red hat 8.0. Now, it is 
    >     > conformable to ISO
    >     > > C99, aclocal 1.6, autoconf 2.53, automake 1.6. But, 
    >     > kernel with Red hat 8.0
    >     > > is not suitable for compiling and running FITH because 
    >     > DProbes and some
    >     > > symbol exports are needed. The CGL precompiled kernel 
    >     > is most suitable for
    >     > > that. :) 
    >     > 
    > http://builds.developer.osdl.org/index.php?ver=v1_0&type=stable
    >     > > 
    >     > > Louis Zhuang, SW Engineer, Intel Corporation.
    >     > > My opinions are my own and NEVER the opinions of Intel 
    >     > Corporation.
    >     > 
    >     > Sorry Louis, but if we want this to be a useful SF 
    >     > project & one that we
    >     > can announce on the LKML, we've got to provide the 
    > patches and
    >     > instructions for someone to take a stock 2.4.x or 2.5.x 
    >     > kernel and get
    >     > it working for use with FIFTH. I would further argue that 
    >     > 2.5.x is more
    >     > important than 2.4.x, at least to the kernel 
    > developer community.
    >     > 
    >     > Look at this way, someone on LKML has no idea what CGLE 
    >     > is, let alone
    >     > TLT. You need to assume your intended audience only knows 
    >     > about the
    >     > stock kernel sources on kernel.org.
    >     > 
    >     > -RobR
    >     > 
    >