On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:49, Lynch, Rusty wrote:
> The dprobes guys are working with a strategy where all of the infrastructure
> for attaching probe points, kernel hooks, and dealing with architecture
> specific debug registers is covered by a kprobes patch, and then dprobes
> would just be one of many consumers of kprobes.
>
> The debates are happening right now, with kprobes patches posted for 2.5.44.
> We need to get a good understanding of these patches since I suspect we
> could at least be a consumer of kprobes (if not of dprobes which will depend
> on kprobes.)
Yeah, that was my thinking as well. Which is why I forwarded that
previous email from the lkml on kprobes vs. dprobes.
>
> Also, depending on how successful dprobes is at this approach, we could
> model our involvement with the kernel after dprobes.
>
> -rusty
>
--
Rob Rhoads mailto:err...@li...
Telecom Software Platforms office: 503-677-5498
Intel Communications Group
<disclaimer value="pointless">
This email message solely contains my own personal views,
and not necessarily those of my employer.
</disclaimer>
|
