fasm-help Mailing List for flat assembler (Page 2)
Brought to you by:
privalov
You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Tomasz G. <fa...@me...> - 2002-11-18 15:40:57
|
> macro testnumeric var > { > if +var eq var > display 'numeric',0 > else > display 'symbol',0 > end if > } > testnumeric 0 ; -> ok > testnumeric eax ;-> ok > testnumeric al ;-> Error: reserved word used as symbol This error come from the parser. "eax" is allowed in expressions, because it can be used as an addressing register (inside square brackets, after "ptr" operator, or after "at" operator with "label" and "virtual" directive), "al" can't and so is not allowed. -- Tomasz |
From: Serge T. <ts...@ra...> - 2002-11-18 12:21:29
|
Dear Tomasz Grysztar! Thank you very much for the FASM, magnificent and elegant tool! J have a little problem: macro testnumeric var { if +var eq var display 'numeric',0 else display 'symbol',0 end if } testnumeric 0 ; -> ok testnumeric eax ;-> ok testnumeric al ;-> Error: reserved word used as symbol With many,many thanx for the support. S.Tserkovitsky ts...@ra... |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-18 07:10:48
|
Hi RG, Sunday, November 17, 2002, 2:13:17 AM, you wrote: RR> What are you guys talking about, RR> C3 is slower than celeron with same frequency. RR> Any 'secret' I can imagine would be some sort of intel's 'speed-step' to RR> make the chip cool, RR> which is no use for a desktop mashine. I know the C3 (current version) is pretty slow when running x86 code, - its the floating point that lets it down. The next version has full speed floating point and is apparently superscaler. But the reason I like the C3 so much is not to run x86 code... ;) -Anthony mailto:an...@do... For more information about Double Dutch Designs Limited, visit http://www.doubledutchdesigns.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify of...@do..., and delete it from your systems. You should not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone without our written permission. Double Dutch Designs emails are scanned for viruses but cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free. We accept no liability for viruses which may inadvertently be transmitted, nor for any loss occasioned by them. This e-mail and any files enclosed remain the property of Double Dutch Designs Limited. |
From: Zubarev A. <za...@ma...> - 2002-11-17 15:35:14
|
From: RG R. <rag...@uk...> - 2002-11-16 17:13:16
|
What are you guys talking about, C3 is slower than celeron with same frequency. Any 'secret' I can imagine would be some sort of intel's 'speed-step' to make the chip cool, which is no use for a desktop mashine. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony" <an...@do...> To: "Fabio Bizzetti" <fas...@li...> Sent: 16 =D0=BD=D0=BE=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2002 =D0=B3. 8:54 Subject: Re[5]: [fasm-help] BIOS initial jmp > Hi Fabio, > > Saturday, November 16, 2002, 4:09:18 PM, you wrote: > > > FB> Hi Antony :) > > >>FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? > >> > >>Nope, much much better than that.... :) > >>But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet > > FB> The AIE? ;) > > Maybe! ;) > > > -Anthony mailto:an...@do... > > For more information about Double Dutch Designs Limited, visit http://www.doubledutchdesigns.com > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify of...@do..., and delete it from your systems. You shou= ld not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone without our writ= ten permission. Double Dutch Designs emails are scanned for viruses but cann= ot be guaranteed to be virus-free. We accept no liability for viruses which may inadvertently be transmitted, nor for any loss occasioned by them. T= his e-mail and any files enclosed remain the property of Double Dutch Designs Limited. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing > your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte > Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html > _______________________________________________ > Fasm-help mailing list > Fas...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fasm-help > > |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-16 17:07:21
|
Hi Antony, >>>FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? >>> >>>Nope, much much better than that.... :) >>>But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet > >FB> The AIE? ;) > >Maybe! ;) :D |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-16 16:54:42
|
Hi Fabio, Saturday, November 16, 2002, 4:09:18 PM, you wrote: FB> Hi Antony :) >>FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? >> >>Nope, much much better than that.... :) >>But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet FB> The AIE? ;) Maybe! ;) -Anthony mailto:an...@do... For more information about Double Dutch Designs Limited, visit http://www.doubledutchdesigns.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify of...@do..., and delete it from your systems. You should not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone without our written permission. Double Dutch Designs emails are scanned for viruses but cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free. We accept no liability for viruses which may inadvertently be transmitted, nor for any loss occasioned by them. This e-mail and any files enclosed remain the property of Double Dutch Designs Limited. |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-16 16:26:49
|
Hi Antony :) >FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? > >Nope, much much better than that.... :) >But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet The AIE? ;) Been waiting for the AMD x86-64 Hammer for ages.. but the VIA C3 looks really cool, expecially for "Home Computers" and embedded systems. Greets, Fabio |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-16 16:04:45
|
Hi Antony :) >FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? > >Nope, much much better than that.... :) >But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet Which one? :D VIA C3 EBGA datasheet v1.10.pdf 451.1 kb Wed, 06 Mar 2002 02:44:55 GMT VIA C3 Ezra datasheet v1.2.PDF 278.2 kb Wed, 19 Jun 2002 02:26:50 GMT VIA C3 Ezra-T datasheet v1.0 .pdf 441.7 kb Wed, 06 Mar 2002 03:01:58 GMT VIA C3 Ezra-T datasheet v1.1 .pdf 403.1 kb Wed, 19 Jun 2002 08:34:16 GMT VIA C3 Samuel 1 datasheet v1.3.pdf 457.7 kb Wed, 06 Mar 2002 03:13:49 GMT VIA C3 Samuel 2 datasheet v 1.10.pdf 549.0 kb Wed, 06 Mar 2002 03:19:26 GMT VIAC31.pdf 281.1 kb Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:00:27 GMT VIAC3Ezra datasheetv105.pdf 363.4 kb Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:00:25 GMT VIAC3_S2datasheet.pdf 449.0 kb Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:00:27 GMT viacyrixIIIdatasheet_1_2.pdf 494.2 kb Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:00:26 GMT Greets, Fabio |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-16 15:39:36
|
Hi Fabio, FB> You mean about SIMD-style extensions? Nope, much much better than that.... :) But I can't tell you anymore - get the C3 datasheet - the clue is at the end... -Anthony mailto:an...@do... For more information about Double Dutch Designs Limited, visit http://www.doubledutchdesigns.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify of...@do..., and delete it from your systems. You should not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone without our written permission. Double Dutch Designs emails are scanned for viruses but cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free. We accept no liability for viruses which may inadvertently be transmitted, nor for any loss occasioned by them. This e-mail and any files enclosed remain the property of Double Dutch Designs Limited. |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-16 14:23:44
|
Hi Antony, >>>My system will have SCART RGB out via the VGA connector - to be linked >>>direct to a TV, not a VGA monitor! > >FB> Very cool, old school. :) > >The SVGA chipset is great to interface to an rgb tv/monitor... no need >for a tv chip... Yup.. reprogrammable blank/synch signals.. I made some experiments on VGA= =2E >FB> How much does it cost the motherboard + the CPU? > >The motherboard with BGA C3 at 800Mhz is about =A370 (100 euros???)... Cheap. :) >FB> Do they provide sample source code, or some sort of support for maki= ng >FB> one's OS drivers for the built in capabilities of the Apollo PLE133? > >I haven't seen any, sorry. But are you going to write a 3D driver for it? I saw the data sheet and i= t looks like it would take some time to do it (expecially for a single code= r). >>>processor have some nice "secret" features... :) >FB> Where can I read about these secret features? > >Sorry, but that too is secret! We had to sign an NDA with VIA, you >could contact VIA... But the C3 chip features are much better than any >other x86 out there! You mean about SIMD-style extensions? >>>Soon I will have an old style monitor or debugger >>>running, so I will then be able to upload updates... > >FB> Very very cool. :) > >FB> Old 8 bit style rules. ;) > >I agree, 8-bit was best! Easiest to get "into", i reckon because of >the built-in basic? Even better if there was a built in monitor/assembler/disassembler. ;D Well.. you know, getting a home computer you turn on and immediately it's usable, and that nice Basic manual coming with the machine gave a certain feeling that has nothing to do with today's "we are all slaves of Microsoft commercial programs, and we must not know what programming is". I guess it's more or less that. ;) >FB> Yup.. the PCI routines come first.. but I think that disassembling t= he >FB> mobo original BIOS may be of help. > >I have all the latest datasheets from VIA, including ones not available = on >the net. But i reckon they are out of date, 'cause with the aga >features setting the datasheet says it should be max x2 AGA, but the >hardware "says" x4!!! wierd... You mean AGP, right? (AGA recalls me so much the Amiga 1200/4000 chipset.= . :P ). >FB> One question: don't you fear that when the chipset goes out of produ= ction >FB> you'll have to remake ~all the work? :( > >VIA have written an open letter stating that the PLE133 and Twister >chipsets will be in production for at least 6 years! They want them >in embedded products... :) That's cool, but the SDRAM will still be cheaply available in 6 years? Or they only mean 100% hardware compatible future products? Keep the great work pal! I wish I had more free time for this kind of stuff.. but it's already written in my destiny, someday I'll make my full-featured computer on the lines of the glorious Amiga. ;) Greets, FabI/O |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-15 17:31:56
|
Hi Fabio, Friday, November 15, 2002, 2:26:08 PM, you wrote: >>I'm writing a fully 32-bit BIOS with built-in BASIC-like language, it >>should boot within about 3 seconds (max)... FB> Cool. :) Thanks! :) >>My system will have SCART RGB out via the VGA connector - to be linked >>direct to a TV, not a VGA monitor! FB> Very cool, old school. :) The SVGA chipset is great to interface to an rgb tv/monitor... no need for a tv chip... FB> How much does it cost the motherboard + the CPU? The motherboard with BGA C3 at 800Mhz is about £70 (100 euros???)... FB> I've been thinking about making "my own computer" too.. can you point me FB> to some resources? Like a BIOS disassembly (just for curiosity). The only bios disassembly i could find was the old "AT" one on the old asm sites... FB> Do they provide sample source code, or some sort of support for making FB> one's OS drivers for the built in capabilities of the Apollo PLE133? I haven't seen any, sorry. >>processor have some nice "secret" features... :) FB> Where can I read about these secret features? Sorry, but that too is secret! We had to sign an NDA with VIA, you could contact VIA... But the C3 chip features are much better than any other x86 out there! The current version has some problems - such as its fp is pretty slow. FB> Do you have a separate flashing circuit, or you use the motherboard's FB> one? Separate, i pull the chip each go! argh! >>Soon I will have an old style monitor or debugger >>running, so I will then be able to upload updates... FB> Very very cool. :) FB> Old 8 bit style rules. ;) I agree, 8-bit was best! Easiest to get "into", i reckon because of the built-in basic? >>I have made a "sub-site" on my website for the project at >>www.doubledutchdesigns.com - it's currently called retro machine (or >>something similar) as I don't yet have a proper name for it! FB> I must say I like it a lot.. 8) FB> You might call it "Cool 64" (Cool like the CPU, 64 like the bus bits :D ). I will maybe do a vote menu on likely name - but thats a way off yet... FB> Yup.. the PCI routines come first.. but I think that disassembling the FB> mobo original BIOS may be of help. I have all the latest datasheets from VIA, including ones not available on the net. But i reckon they are out of date, 'cause with the aga features setting the datasheet says it should be max x2 AGA, but the hardware "says" x4!!! wierd... FB> One question: don't you fear that when the chipset goes out of production FB> you'll have to remake ~all the work? :( VIA have written an open letter stating that the PLE133 and Twister chipsets will be in production for at least 6 years! They want them in embedded products... :) >>If your not in the UK, then do a >>search for EP-P80P made by EPoX Computer Company - they are about the >>same price worldwide... FB> Thx. No problem... FB> Do you wish to commercialize your own computer? Anyway, following the FB> old 8 bit style may be great. I have my own almost-mature OS, and was FB> thinking about getting rid of that old crap BIOS as well. :) FB> Keep the great work pal! Thanks, you have a go too, it isn't that hard... >>-Anthony |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-15 15:23:00
|
Hi Antony, >FB> Sorry, can't help you with this question (others, or Tomasz himself,= will >FB> surely do it soon).. but I'd want to ask you something: > >FB> When you develop your BIOS, you'll want to test it from time to time= : do >FB> you flash it every time, or you know any way to write to the shadow = ram? > >FB> Any other detail you may want to share? I'm interested into writing = my >FB> own BIOS too. > >I'm writing a fully 32-bit BIOS with built-in BASIC-like language, it >should boot within about 3 seconds (max)... Cool. :) >My system will have SCART RGB out via the VGA connector - to be linked >direct to a TV, not a VGA monitor! Very cool, old school. :) >I'm basing it on the PLE133 chipset as this is used in EPIA motherboards= , >i'm using the C3 processor as this is a cool running 800Mhz processor >(fan not required!)... Its all also pretty cheap & easy to get! How much does it cost the motherboard + the CPU? I've been thinking about making "my own computer" too.. can you point me to some resources? Like a BIOS disassembly (just for curiosity). >The PLE chipset has sound/graphics etc all "built-in" so I don't need >to talk to "other" video chipsets, I can optimise the system for the >video chipset onboard. Right. I've just downloaded the data sheet. Do they provide sample source code, or some sort of support for making one's OS drivers for the built in capabilities of the Apollo PLE133? >The C3 is x86 compatible and has a good future as this and the next >versions of the processor have some nice "secret" features... :) Where can I read about these secret features? >Currently i'm doing it all the VERY hard way, i'm reflashing every >test run... Do you have a separate flashing circuit, or you use the motherboard's one? >Soon I will have an old style monitor or debugger >running, so I will then be able to upload updates... Very very cool. :) Old 8 bit style rules. ;) >I have made a "sub-site" on my website for the project at >www.doubledutchdesigns.com - it's currently called retro machine (or >something similar) as I don't yet have a proper name for it! I must say I like it a lot.. 8) You might call it "Cool 64" (Cool like the CPU, 64 like the bus bits :D )= =2E >The hard bit was getting anything to work at all... Don't forget >that until you get things working a little bit, you have hardly any >access to hardware... Yup.. the PCI routines come first.. but I think that disassembling the mobo original BIOS may be of help. One question: don't you fear that when the chipset goes out of production you'll have to remake ~all the work? :( >A great help was a port $80 (0x80) debug card, i found a cheap source >at "Los Altos" http://www.losaltos.co.uk/ - it was =A315 +vat +p&p =3D >just over =A320... (30 euros?)... If your not in the UK, then do a >search for EP-P80P made by EPoX Computer Company - they are about the >same price worldwide... Thx. >With the card you can (from reset!!!) output to the port a number >(A POST CODE), this can be anything you want - At each routine output >a different number, if the display "freezes", then you know that the >pc has locked up at a particular routine. This is always the first kind of debugger one makes. :D >When trying to track down >one particular bug that locked the machine I had a different number >per line of the routine!!! :))) Do you wish to commercialize your own computer? Anyway, following the old 8 bit style may be great. I have my own almost-mature OS, and was thinking about getting rid of that old crap BIOS as well. :) Keep the great work pal! >-Anthony |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-15 13:50:56
|
Hi Tomasz, TG> Thursday, November 14, 2002, 8:41:44 PM, you wrote: >> db $66 >> lgdt [cs:bx] TG> Why do you need the 66h prefix before the lgdt instruction? AFAIK this TG> instruction works the same way whether it has such prefix or not. If TG> there was some difference, fasm would allow syntax for prefix be TG> automatically generated. Just tried it without prefix, no problems. Thanks for the help. -Anthony |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-15 11:29:00
|
Hi Fabio, Thursday, November 14, 2002, 9:29:13 PM, you wrote: FB> Sorry, can't help you with this question (others, or Tomasz himself, will FB> surely do it soon).. but I'd want to ask you something: FB> When you develop your BIOS, you'll want to test it from time to time: do FB> you flash it every time, or you know any way to write to the shadow ram? FB> Any other detail you may want to share? I'm interested into writing my FB> own BIOS too. I'm writing a fully 32-bit BIOS with built-in BASIC-like language, it should boot within about 3 seconds (max)... My system will have SCART RGB out via the VGA connector - to be linked direct to a TV, not a VGA monitor! I'm basing it on the PLE133 chipset as this is used in EPIA motherboards, i'm using the C3 processor as this is a cool running 800Mhz processor (fan not required!)... Its all also pretty cheap & easy to get! The PLE chipset has sound/graphics etc all "built-in" so I don't need to talk to "other" video chipsets, I can optimise the system for the video chipset onboard. The C3 is x86 compatible and has a good future as this and the next versions of the processor have some nice "secret" features... :) Currently i'm doing it all the VERY hard way, i'm reflashing every test run... Soon I will have an old style monitor or debugger running, so I will then be able to upload updates... I have made a "sub-site" on my website for the project at www.doubledutchdesigns.com - it's currently called retro machine (or something similar) as I don't yet have a proper name for it! The hard bit was getting anything to work at all... Don't forget that until you get things working a little bit, you have hardly any access to hardware... A great help was a port $80 (0x80) debug card, i found a cheap source at "Los Altos" http://www.losaltos.co.uk/ - it was £15 +vat +p&p = just over £20... (30 euros?)... If your not in the UK, then do a search for EP-P80P made by EPoX Computer Company - they are about the same price worldwide... With the card you can (from reset!!!) output to the port a number (A POST CODE), this can be anything you want - At each routine output a different number, if the display "freezes", then you know that the pc has locked up at a particular routine. When trying to track down one particular bug that locked the machine I had a different number per line of the routine!!! -Anthony |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-15 11:08:58
|
Hi Tomasz, Thursday, November 14, 2002, 10:31:39 PM, you wrote: TG> Thursday, November 14, 2002, 8:41:44 PM, you wrote: >> db $66 >> lgdt [cs:bx] TG> Why do you need the 66h prefix before the lgdt instruction? AFAIK this TG> instruction works the same way whether it has such prefix or not. If TG> there was some difference, fasm would allow syntax for prefix be TG> automatically generated. Will try it in a few minutes... Thanks once again... -Anthony |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-15 11:07:00
|
Hi Tomasz, Thursday, November 14, 2002, 10:36:33 PM, you wrote: >> use16 >> jmp ((StartOS shr 4)and $f000):(StartOS and $ffff) ; 16-bit jump with segment change >> Where this code is located at $ffff:0000 and "StartOS" is the address >> of the 1st routine in the bios (located initially at $f0000)... >> Is this the correct syntax to do this kind of jmp or is there a >> simpler looking way? TG> Yes, this is correct (but $ffff:0000=$ffff0, not $f0000). TG> Or just simply: TG> jmp $ffff:0 Thanks for getting back so quick, great assembler btw! :) I think you misunderstood me - this code is at $ffff:0000 (reset vector), so StartOS is actually at $f0000, the ((StartOS shr 4)and $f000) will shift $f0000 right 4 = $f000, then mask off the top bits to make $f000 (just in case there was anything in $0fff)... The Address part being the low 16 bits of $f0000, is just masked off making zero... It's just a way of making the reset vector point to the StartOS code, I just wondered if there was an easier way of syntaxing the instruction? TG> BTW, 16-bit is the default setting for the binary output format, so TG> use16 is usually not neccessary. There is 32-bit code before this code - I switched back for the vector - that is in REAL mode... :) -Anthony |
From: Tomasz G. <fa...@me...> - 2002-11-14 22:34:58
|
> use16 > jmp ((StartOS shr 4)and $f000):(StartOS and $ffff) ; 16-bit jump with segment change > Where this code is located at $ffff:0000 and "StartOS" is the address > of the 1st routine in the bios (located initially at $f0000)... > Is this the correct syntax to do this kind of jmp or is there a > simpler looking way? Yes, this is correct (but $ffff:0000=$ffff0, not $f0000). Or just simply: jmp $ffff:0 BTW, 16-bit is the default setting for the binary output format, so use16 is usually not neccessary. -- Tomasz |
From: Tomasz G. <fa...@me...> - 2002-11-14 22:30:19
|
Thursday, November 14, 2002, 8:41:44 PM, you wrote: > db $66 > lgdt [cs:bx] Why do you need the 66h prefix before the lgdt instruction? AFAIK this instruction works the same way whether it has such prefix or not. If there was some difference, fasm would allow syntax for prefix be automatically generated. -- Tomasz |
From: Fabio B. <biz...@li...> - 2002-11-14 21:57:23
|
Sorry, can't help you with this question (others, or Tomasz himself, will surely do it soon).. but I'd want to ask you something: When you develop your BIOS, you'll want to test it from time to time: do you flash it every time, or you know any way to write to the shadow ram? Any other detail you may want to share? I'm interested into writing my own BIOS too. At 13.57 14/11/2002 +0000, you wrote: > >Hi, > >I'm (attempting to) writing a custom BIOS...! > >Am i using this statement correctly: > > use16 > jmp ((StartOS shr 4)and $f000):(StartOS and $ffff) ; 16-bit jump >with segment change > > >Where this code is located at $ffff:0000 and "StartOS" is the address >of the 1st routine in the bios (located initially at $f0000)... > >Is this the correct syntax to do this kind of jmp or is there a >simpler looking way? > >-Anthony > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing >your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte >Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html >_______________________________________________ >Fasm-help mailing list >Fas...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fasm-help |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-14 19:42:12
|
Hi, Is there a built-in way to specify the 32-bit prefix when in 16-bit mode? So I dont have to do the following? db $66 lgdt [cs:bx] eg, something like: code32 lgdt [cs:bx] ???? -Anthony |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-14 13:58:57
|
Hi, I'm (attempting to) writing a custom BIOS...! Am i using this statement correctly: use16 jmp ((StartOS shr 4)and $f000):(StartOS and $ffff) ; 16-bit jump with segment change Where this code is located at $ffff:0000 and "StartOS" is the address of the 1st routine in the bios (located initially at $f0000)... Is this the correct syntax to do this kind of jmp or is there a simpler looking way? -Anthony |
From: <za...@ma...> - 2002-11-14 05:56:43
|
za...@ma... |
From: Aquila <aq...@zi...> - 2002-11-11 11:46:46
|
Hello Tomasz, Monday, November 11, 2002, 2:21:49 AM, you wrote: TG> The website has been updated with the small layout changes and the new TG> releases of flat assembler - final console version 1.41 and also a TG> pre-release of version for the Win32 GUI. Please test it. Nice. Why do you didn't do MDI like in Assembler Workplace? -- Best regards, Aquila mailto:aq...@zi... |
From: Anthony <an...@do...> - 2002-11-11 02:19:58
|
Hi Tomasz, Sunday, November 10, 2002, 11:21:49 PM, you wrote: TG> The website has been updated with the small layout changes and the new TG> releases of flat assembler - final console version 1.41 and also a TG> pre-release of version for the Win32 GUI. Please test it. Works great! Would be nice if opcodes had a colour too... Did you get the document file I emailed you (it was a file you lost - fasmguide - An illustrated guide to flat assembler internal structure) ?? -Anthony mailto:an...@do... For more information about Double Dutch Designs Limited, visit http://www.doubledutchdesigns.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify of...@do..., and delete it from your systems. You should not copy, disclose, or distribute its contents to anyone without our written permission. Double Dutch Designs emails are scanned for viruses but cannot be guaranteed to be virus-free. We accept no liability for viruses which may inadvertently be transmitted, nor for any loss occasioned by them. This e-mail and any files enclosed remain the property of Double Dutch Designs Limited. |