Re: [Fase-developer] File Parser

[Alex <ax...@m-...>]

Simple is good. The database connection was just so others could easily
get at the data and manipulate it. The parser only extracts raw data from
the logs.




On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote:

>
>  Hi folks:
>
>  I'd like to make some suggestions.
>
>  1. I agree that it's better to use Apache::ParseLog. It's the Perl way,
> and it's a best pratice for programming: Lazyness
>
>  2. Is a database connectio *really* necessary? Maybe it's a good idea to
> rotate logs and consolidate them in a separete file, and then parse each
> time required. I mean, just like KISS ;o)
>
>  What do you think about it?
>
>  mazza
>
> --------------------
> Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Fase-developer mailing list
> Fas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fase-developer
>